NBC Sports: MLB 1979-ALCS-Game 2-Anaheim Angeles @ Baltimore Orioles: Full Game

.
The New Democrat

Game two of the 1979 ALCS being played at the “Outdoor Insane Asylum”, as Baltimore Memorial Stadium was called. As it should’ve been being perhaps the loudest outdoor stadium in pro major league sports in America. Both for baseball and football giving, the Orioles and Colts huge home field advantages especially when they were good. This was a game that the Angels basically had to have, since they only won one game in Anaheim, but failed to get. Different ALCS had the Angels managed to win game two, going back to Anaheim with a split and the momentum and a chance to win two out of three to win the American League Championship. All the Orioles wanted to do in this game, was to win it and go to Anaheim with a shot at clinching the ALCS in game 3.

Posted in Orioles Classic Games, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The New Republic: Opinion- David Greenberg- JFK Was An Unapologetic Liberal

JFK Liberal

Source: U.S. Senator John F. Kennedy


Source: This piece was originally posted at The New Democrat

JFK in a video from 1960 when he was running for President of the United States as U.S. Senator John F. Kennedy, gave a speech at the New York State Liberal Party convention defining liberalism and what liberalism is to him. And a couple of things from this speech that partisan right-wingers who like to view him as a Conservative and Progressives who are in love with the welfare state and based most of their politics around what the Federal Government can do for people should take from this speech. Which will be on this blog and that you can find for yourself on YouTube.

For right-wingers he was saying why he was a Liberal and what liberalism isn’t. Which should be enough evidence for them if that is what they are interested in seeing, instead just trying to score political points off it, as well as with his administration. And for the let’s say today’s Progressives who I prefer to call Social Democrats which is a little different, when you see this video about how Jack Kennedy felt about his liberalism and liberalism in general, they should know, again if they are interested in facts and not just scoring political points, from JFK while he was in Congress or as President of the United States, wasn’t as far to the Left for them when it came to economic or foreign policy.

So-called Progressives like to partially quote Jack Kennedy’s speech from 1960 on Liberalism. And they only use the part where he says, “if being a Liberal is someone who cares about the welfare of others, their education, housing, health care, their economic security” to use as examples, than he meaning JFK is a Liberal. And they use this one part of a much larger speech. And David Greenburg of The New Republic whose column today in The New Republic that you can read by clicking the link on this blog, his column was no different.

And so-called Progressives use it to make the case that JFK was a Liberal. But in the way that Social Democrats see Liberalism and Liberals, people who believe that it is the job of government to look after people and take care of people and that is how you secure freedom for everyone. Instead of empowering people to be able to make their own decisions and be able to take care of themselves. Which is the real definition and version of economic liberalism. Using government to empower those who need it in order to be able to take care of themselves.

I’ll just layout the other half of what Senator Kennedy said about liberalism from 1960, which again you can see by viewing the video from this blog. Senator Jack Kennedy said, “that if being Liberal is about being soft abroad, or being Liberal is about being against local government and local control, or being Liberal is someone whose not concern with people’s tax dollars”, than he meaning John F. Kennedy is not a Liberal. So there goes the social democratic version of JFK that today’s so-called Progressives or ‘Modern Liberals’, a term I hate as a Liberal myself and how JFK was not that type of Democrat. Now here is the liberal version of Jack Kennedy and how he described his own liberalism.

“If a Liberal is someone who looks forward and not behind, who welcomes new ideas, cares about the welfare of others, than I” meaning JFK is proud to be a Liberal”. But most people on the Left care about the welfare of others, because most of us have a role for government when it comes to the economy. Because we do not want a small percentage of the country controlling so much of the wealth. Where we disagree on the Left from Liberals on the Center-Left to let’s say Social Democrats or Democratic Socialists is where it comes to what type and how much government involvement in the economy.

Democratic Socialists on the Far-Left have big role for what government should do in the economy. And what it should actually be doing for people in these areas. And President Kennedy did not govern as someone who had a new government program or expansion of a current government program to meet most of it not all the economic and personal needs of people in the United States. He wanted government to be there to help people who needed it, but also to help them be able to help themselves.

Senator Kennedy also went on to say in his 1960 speech about liberalism, “that being Liberal is not about being in favor of a superstate, or being in favor of government force when voluntary action will do to solve our problems in society”. He was in favor of a strong effective Federal Government to so the things that we needed it to do. Not to try to run people’s lives for them. That government should be there to help people in need be able to help themselves. And meet the national security, law enforcement, equal rights protections meaning civil rights challenges, as well as foreign policy concerns of the country. That is what liberalism was to him, as well as myself. And what liberalism actually is and not how it has been successfully stereotyped by the right-wing and use to run with by the New-Left.
Zencat: JFK 1960 Liberal Party Nomination Speech

Posted in JFK | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

University of Chicago: Video: George E. Kent Lecture: Michelle Alexander, The New Jim Crow

.
This post was originally posted at The New Democrat on Blogger

I do not agree with everything that Professor Michelle Alexander says about the American prison system. And the broader race relations in America, but I agree with her broader premise that we incarcerate too many people in this country and educate too few. And that this overwhelmingly effects racial and ethnic minorities in this country especially the African-American community. But I believe where I may disagree with Professor Alexander is that it is not racism that is the problem in this issue.

But the lack of good schools and the high poverty in these communities leaving students in these communities without the ability to make a good living and be successful in life. And dropping out of high school which is a huge mistake on their part and they end up hanging out with the wrong people. Who also made similar mistakes as young adults and end up in a life as a criminal in and out of the criminal justice system. Instead of finishing high school and going onto college and getting themselves the skills that they need to be successful in a legal profession in life.

The so-called New Jim Crow in our society is on two fronts at least as I see it. One how it gets started with our public education system failing too many people and the African-American community probably gets hit hardest by this, but also because of the mistakes that adolescents in this community make early in life. Like not succeeding and finishing high school, having kids before they are adults themselves and then walking out on their kids and leaving them with a life of poverty as well.

The second front has to do with what happens to many Americans of all races once they are in the criminal justice system after being convicted of crimes. That leaves them with very little if any opportunity to succeed in life once they are out of prison. That our prison system has become about warehousing people instead of improving inmates lives. And empowering them with the skills to succeed with and education and giving them legitimate work experience that they can take with them to get themselves a good job outside of prison.

The failed so-called War on Drugs is also a big problem here, but it is not the only problem. We do not deal with non-violent offenders very well and come down too hard on them. And use prison as the first and in many times only option too often. But we do not do a very good job with our violent inmates that need to be in prison and get them to improve themselves and be able to see a life not just outside of crime, but especially violent crime. So they no longer feel the need or want to hurt people.

Because we lock offenders up and then release them not much if any opportunity to succeed in life on the outside, what we do is just repeat the process over and over. The what is called the revolving door of our criminal justice system. While our schools continue to fail too many people and while too many of our students fail at school. And the never-ending cycle of life of poverty, crime and prison continues to turn with no end in sight.
8596929230_760f70e3dd_o

Posted in Crime & Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

NBC Sports: MLB 1983-NLCS-Game 4-Los Angeles Dodgers @ Philadelphia Phillies: Full Game

 

1983 NLCS Game 4 - Dodgers vs Philles @mrodsports

Source:Classic Phillies TV– Philadelphia Phillies fan at Veterans Stadium, watching game 4 of the 1983 NLCS. 

Source:The New Democrat 

“1983 NLCS Game 4 – Dodgers vs Philles”

From Classic Phillies TV

I don’t believe there was a better pitcher you would want pitching in a big game, a series clinching game than Steve Carlton. When he was on and generally that was most of the time, I believe he was the best of the 1970s and 80s. The only other two pitchers I would consider would be Tom Seaver and Jim Palmer of this era.

And this is what the Dodgers were facing on the road at Philadelphia Veterans Stadium against perhaps still the best pitcher in the game at this point, certainly in the National League in Steve Carlton. And having to beat Carlton just to force another elimination game which would’ve been game 5. This game was perfectly set up for the Phillies. At home, with their best pitcher, if not the best in MLB and playing to eliminate the Dodgers and move on to the MLB World Series.

Posted in NLB Classic Games | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ABC Sports: MLB 1978- NLCS Game 4- Philadelphia Phillies @ Los Angeles Dodgers: Full Game

1978 NLCS Game 4 - Phillies vs Dodgers @mrodsports (2013) - Google Search

Source:ABC Sports– with the 1978 MLB-NLCS.

Source:The New Democrat

“1978 NLCS Game 4 – Phillies vs Dodgers @mrodsports”

From Classic Phillies TV

This was a very good matchup for an NLCS between the Phillies and Dodgers because you had a more power-hitting offensive oriented team in the Phillies, going up against a pitching and defensive oriented team in the Dodgers that also had a very good lineup, with hitters like Steve Garvey, Reggie Smith, Ron Cey, Dusty Baker and others. And I think that was the difference in this series. The teams were fairly even, but the Dodgers had more pitching and I believe a more complete team than the Phillies.

On paper anyway, I think the Dodgers were better than the New York Yankees in 1978. I think they had more offensively and had just as must pitching. But the Yankees got better pitching and clutch hitting in the 1978 World Series and that was the difference.

You can’t really afford any off games in a World Series or a championship series. Which is what happened to the Phillies in the first two games of the NLCS losing both of them at home. And having to win three-straight at Dodger stadium to win the series.

Posted in NLB Classic Games | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Reason Magazine: Nick Gillespie Interviewing Jonathan Rauch: Twenty-Years of Political Correctness

.
Source:The New Democrat 

I’m not a fan of political correctness myself, because I am a Liberal not because I’m not a Liberal. I’m against all racial and ethnic slurs and all other types of slurs that try to paint one group of people as they are. All the way, but again as a Liberal I believe in the First Amendment and the ability for people to speak freely. As long as they aren’t threatening or libeling people in a negative way or inciting violence in public. And those are really the only exceptions we have to our First Amendment in the United States.

Just because people have negative, bigoted and ignorant views about others, doesn’t mean they do not have a right to express those opinions. As long as they aren’t calling for those people to be harmed physically or economically in any way. If you are a Liberal, you believe in the First Amendment and are in favor of it. And you do not believe in these things, you are not a Liberal. Because liberalism is about one’s ability to speak freely and assemble in public and in private. And you take away free speech, you do not have much if any remaining of what can be called a liberal democracy. Because you are taking people’s freedom away from them.

So when I hear these political speech codes from people who are supposed to be on the Left, because someone or a group of people are saying things that these leftist groups find offensive, because it offends people they support, generally racial or religious minorities, or political minorities on the Far-Left, like Communists and Socialists, one I disagree with them. Because we all as Americans including the Far-Left have the First Amendment right to express ourselves and have our own opinions. Including the Far-Left and Far-Right.

But it gives me the impression that some at least on the Far-Left do not believe in free speech, or at least free speech that they disagree with. But the other thing that gets me as a Liberal is when I hear supporters of what is called the political correctness movement, people who are supposed to be Liberals, when of course they are not, because they believe in a form of fascism. “That is you can say what you want and believe in what, until you offend us. And that is when we are going to try to shut you up. And there is nothing liberal about that.

It is pretty simple. If you are a Liberal you believe in free speech and the First Amendment. And if you do not believe in these things, you are not a Liberal. But perhaps a Fascist either from the Far-Left or Far-Right. Bigotry is an awful thing and in many cases illegal in the United States when it is put into action. But that doesn’t mean Americans do not have a right to be stupid, it just means they do not always have a right to act on those stupid beliefs. When they hurt innocent people with them. Like denying people jobs based on race, ethnicity, gender to use as examples.

Posted in Reason, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

NBC Sports: MLB 1980- World Series Game 6-Kansas City Royals @ Philadelphia Phillies: Full Game

The Daily Press_ NBC Sports_ MLB 1980- World Series Game 7-Kansas City Royals @ Philadelphia Phillies_ Full GameSource:NBC Sports– Philadelphia Phillies closer Tug McGraw.

“Kansas City Royals 1 at Philadelphia Phillies 4, F — With the Phillies just one tantalizing out away from a Championship, Tug McGraw got ahead on Willie Wilson, then struck him out swinging at a 1-2 fastball. McGraw threw his arms up, his teammates jumped all over each other, and the franchise had its first baseball championship.”

From MLB Vault

1980 might have been the best Kansas Royals team that they ever had. They had a very good lineup offensively, good defense, good pitching both starting and in the bullpen, Jim Fry was their manager. Unlike the 85 team that was really just George Brett and Hal McRae offensively. Steve Balboni hit a lot of home runs for them, but drove in under ninety runs, which isn’t much for a guy who hits thirty-six home runs and also hit around 240 and struck out a lot. But the 80 Royals had balance offensively, defensively and in their pitching. But couldn’t even force the Phillies into a game 7.

The 1980 Phillies were just very good everywhere. Not a great lineup with a lot of great players, but very good hitters up and down the lineup. They were very good defensively and had excellent pitching. With Steve Carlton as their ace and Tug McGraw in the bullpen. Not a team with any clear weakness’ and they were just the best team in the National League throughout the 1980 season. And a team that finally put it all together after getting to the NL Playoffs in 76 and 78, but losing both NL Championships to the Los Angeles Dodgers. So 1980 was a year that the Phillies believed they had something to prove and came through.

You can also see this post at The Daily Press, on Blogger.

You can also see this post at The Daily Press, on WordPress.

You can also see this post at FRS FreeState, on Blogger.

You can also see this post at FRS FreeState, on WordPress.

Posted in MLB Classic Games, Originals | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

CBS Sports: NBA 1975-ECSF-Game 4-Washington Wizards @ Buffalo Braves: Bob McAdoo Scores 50 Points

.
Source:The New Democrat 

Anytime there’s a choice between having the player who scored the most points in a game and the team that scored the most points in a game, especially a playoff game I would always take the team. When one player scores fifty points and his team loses, it generally means he was doing most of the scoring for his team in that game. And that his teammates weren’t doing much damage to the other team. Classic example of Michael Jordan vs. the Boston Celtics in the 1986 Eastern Conference Quarterfinals, where he scored sixty points in back-to-back games, but the Celtics beat the Chicago Bulls in both games and beat them badly.

That is how you defended Bob McAdoo when he was with the Buffalo Braves. You guarded him tough and you tried to stop him. But not to the point where it would free up other Braves to beat you with open shots and layups. Now it so happens that the Braves won this game and Big Bob was able to put the Braves on his back. But the Bullets won this series, because they had a better team, even if the Braves had the better player in the series. Good teams, or in the Bullets case very good teams, if not great teams generally beat teams that have a great player, if that player doesn’t have a very good supporting cast around him.

Posted in The New Democrat, Wizards Classic | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

American Thinker: Jim Yardley: ‘A Different View of Paternalism’

american thinker_ daniel payne - Google SearchSource:The New Democrat 

There are two forms of paternalism at least as I see it. One that obviously comes from our parents as shocking as that may sound and I believe the only people it should come from. And as annoying as and in some cases positive parental paternalism may sound, our parents at least tend to have our best interests at heart even when they go too far.

But then there is what I call governmental paternalism whether it comes from governmental laws, or proposals to create new paternalistic laws and they are basically built around the notion even if they are done with the best intentions, that government knows best what the people themselves need for their own good. Things like proposals to outlaw homosexual activity or pornography from the Far-Right. To having the Federal Government regulate marriage in the United States.

To paternalistic proposals from the Far-Left in trying to regulate what people can eat, drink or smoke for our own good. Because paternalists on the Far-Left believe they know best what people should be eating, drinking and smoking. And as much as right-wingers especially those right-wingers who may have some governmental paternalistic views when it comes to social issues, like to label the Affordable Care Act as paternalistic, it is not. Because what it does with the minimum health insurance requirement is to say that everyone is required to have enough health insurance to meet their own individual health care needs.

So people in America can’t past their own health care costs on to other people. The Affordable Care Act doesn’t require people to live healthy and take care of themselves. What it says is that we are all responsible for our own health care costs at least those of us who can afford our own health insurance. And for those of us who choose to live unhealthy, they can still do that, but they won’t be able to pass the costs of their unhealthy decisions on to other people.

Posted in American Thinker, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Townhall: Derek Hunter: The Problem With Libertarians

Source:The New Democrat 

I’m just going to start this post by laying out what I believe libertarianism is from actual Libertarians that I respect. Even though I’m not a Libertarian myself and tend to disagree with Libertarians especially when it comes to economic and foreign policy. Even though I tend to agree with them on social issues.

Basically a Libertarian to paraphrase economics professor Walter E. Williams who I believe is now at George Mason University, is someone who believes in complete property rights as well as the right to privacy. That property rights extend to one’s own body and life and what they do with themselves and their own lives is their own business. As long as they aren’t hurting innocent people with what they are doing. That the money they make is there’s and how they spend their own money and what they do on their own time is their own business. As long as they aren’t hurting any innocent person with their own money and time.

So what people do with their own lives and time is their own business. But where government comes in is how people interact with each other. Someone can own a gun, but they can’t hurt an innocent person with it and certainly not murder anyone with it. To it bluntly a guy could bang a prostitute, but they are not allowed to rape anyone. No one would be allowed to rape anyone in a so-called libertarian society. People can smoke and sell marijuana, but can’t force people to buy, use or sell it themselves.

That is the definition of what I call a classical Libertarian, which are the real Libertarians. They aren’t anti-government, but are certainly anti-big government and want government out of our personal and economic lives. As long as we aren’t hurting innocent people with what we are doing. That government’s job is regulate how people interact with each other, not what we do to ourselves. And the basic reason why I’m a Liberal and not a Libertarian, is because even though we tend to agree On most if not all social issues, we tend to separate when it comes to economic and foreign policy.

And I do believe in limited government when it comes to economic and foreign policy as well. But I do not believe that the Federal Government should just be limited to a Department of State, Department of Defense, Department of Treasury and perhaps a few others. That the Federal Government has more constitutional authority and responsibility than that. But it should be limited to doing only what the states, localities and people can’t do for themselves.

I could get into the difference between classical Libertarianism and what I call anarcho-Libertarianism. Anarcho-Libertarianism basically believe in a form of anarchism. But that is really for another blog, this what just about countering what Derek Hunter of Townhall wrote about Libertarianism today. Which was wrong and I instead gave you what it is at least in it’s classical form.

Posted in New Right, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment