Michael Smerconish: What’s Next For University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill

What's next for University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill_ #news #politics #currentaffairsSource:Michael Smerconish talking about the University of Pennsylvania President. 

Source:The New Democrat

“Subscribe for daily news live streams every day at 8:00am ET. If you’re enjoying our content, please share our channel on social media!

Listen daily on SiriusXM POTUS Channel 124 9am-12 ET daily, Encore 9pm-12 ET.”

From Michael Smerconish

“The University of Pennsylvania’s president on Thursday faced new backlash for her comments during a congressional hearing — after she had already apologized for how she said she would handle remarks in the university community calling for the “genocide of Jews.”

The Republican-led House Education Committee announced Thursday that it is opening an investigation into the policies and disciplinary procedures at Penn, Harvard and MIT after finding testimony from Elizabeth Magill, Penn’s president, along with that of Harvard President Claudine Gay and MIT President Sally Kornbluth — “absolutely unacceptable.”

Rep. Virginia Foxx, the committee’s Republican chairwoman, said members have “deep concerns with their leadership and their failure to take steps to provide Jewish students the safe learning environment they are due under law.”

Several of Pennsylvania’s elected leaders have denounced Magill’s comments made during Tuesday’s congressional hearing, with some calling for her resignation. The university’s board of trustees held a hastily scheduled meeting Thursday, but there is no board plan for imminent leadership change at Penn, according to the university spokesperson.

During the House Education Committee hearing Tuesday on how three university presidents have handled antisemitism on their campuses, Magill had a tense exchange with New York Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik.” 

From ABC News

“The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prevents the government from making laws that: regulate an establishment of religion; prohibit the free exercise of religion; abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.”

From Wikipedia

“Genocide is the intentional destruction of a people[a] in whole or in part. In 1948, the United Nations Genocide Convention defined genocide as any of five “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”. These five acts were: killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children out of the group. Victims are targeted because of their real or perceived membership of a group, not randomly.” 

From Wikipedia

The New Democrat talks about free speech a lot because we’re Liberal Democrats and one of, if not the biggest liberal value, along with freedom of choice and the belief in personal autonomy, and property rights, is the belief in freedom of speech.

So of course Americans not have a constitutional right to free speech, but that even includes hate speech. We have a right to even believe that Jews, along with every other ethnic group in America, are subhuman (as nasty as that sounds) who don’t even deserve to live and breath on Planet Earth. But we don’t have a constitutional right to act on those genocidal and bigoted views. We don’t have a right to call in public for Jews, or any other ethnic group in this country, to be murdered simply because they’re Jewish, because of their ethnicity.

Both the University of Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania, are private institutions. But there’s a big catch here, they both receive Federal tax dollars. And if they want to continue to receive those tax dollars, they have to show that this money is not going to support genocidal propaganda against any ethnic group in this country, including at their own institutions, or in the rest of the country.

I don’t agree with most of what the MAGA run U.S. House of Representatives has done this year, including Representative Elise Stefanik, who had her own issues dealing with genocide last year when she endorsed a Republican House candidate who praised Adolf Hitler. A man who murdered not just Jews because they were Jewish, but Poles, because they’re Polish, back in the 1930s and 40s, (Elise Stefanik is Polish-American) but they were damn right in bringing these college president’s to U.S. Capitol this week, to testify about the genocidal rhetoric against their Jewish students. And those presidents for college president’s, look pretty braindead and tone death.

Posted in Michael Smerconish, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Michael Popok: ‘Georgia Prosecutors Name SHOCKING WITNESS That Could END DONALD TRUMP, His WORST NIGHTMARE’

Georgia Prosecutors name SHOCKING WITNESS that could END TRUMP, His WORST NIGHTMARESource:Meidas Touch– left to tight: Donald J. Trump’s 1st or 2nd worst nightmare, Fulton County, Georgia Fani Willis & Defendant Don Trump.

Source:The New Democrat

“Mike Pence is not only cooperating with Special Counsel Jack Smith to testify against Trump in March on the DC federal case, BUT IS A NAMED WITNESS in Georgia to testify against Trump in the 13 count felony case there. Michael Popok of Legal AF details all the video evidence Pence will have to explain and his likely testimony to prove Trump committed crimes.”

From the Meidas Touch

“Michael Richard Pence (born June 7, 1959) is an American politician who served as the 48th vice president of the United States from 2017 to 2021 under Donald Trump. A member of the Republican Party, he previously served as the 50th governor of Indiana from 2013 to 2017, and a member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 2001 to 2013.”

From Wikipedia

“Donald John Trump (born June 14, 1946) is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.”

From Wikipedia

“Fani Taifa Willis[2] (/fɑːniː/, FAH-nee;[2] born 1971[1]) is the district attorney of Fulton County, Georgia, which contains most of Atlanta.[3] She is the first woman to hold the office.”

From Wikipedia

I would add serial reality TV sand tabloid star, as well as wannabe American dictator, to Donald J. Trump’s Wikipedia resume. But his official resume that I posted from Wikipedia, is completely accurate.

I’m just posting this profile information about these three key players in the Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia trial, against former President Donald J. Trump, to give you a good idea of what DJT is going up against.

Mike Pence, was then Republican nominee Trump’s handpicked choice for Vice President, back in 2016. Fani Willis is a career lawyer, whose made her career putting away violent thugs and other criminals, like gangsters. Donald J. Trump, once again is a serial reality TV and tabloid star, and wannabe American dictator, who believes that the rule of law doesn’t apply to him.

Now seriously, if you are an intelligent, sane, sober, and responsible individual, who would you rather believe: the two career public servants, or the serial reality TV and tabloid star/wannabe American dictator? The answer should be obvious.

Posted in Meidas Touch, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Amanpour & Company: ‘Civil War Confederate President Wasn’t Tried, Why It Matters In Donald Trump Case’

Amanpour & Company_ Civil War Confederate President Wasn’t Tried, Why It Matters In Donald Trump CasSource:Amanpour & Company talking to New Yorker columnist Jill Lepore.

Source:The New Democrat

“Donald Trump made history as the first U.S. president to be criminally indicted. But he is not the first ex-president to undergo prosecution. In her latest piece for The New Yorker, Jill Lepore argues that the failure of the American government to prosecute Jefferson Davis, former president of the Confederacy, more than 150 years ago, could hold lessons for America as Trump awaits trial. Lepore joins the show.”

From Amanpour & Company

“Jefferson Davis, the half-blind ex-President of the Confederate States of America, leaned on a cane as he hobbled into a federal courthouse in Richmond, Virginia. Only days before, a Chicago Tribune reporter, who’d met Davis on the boat ride to Richmond, had written that “his step is light and elastic.” But in court, facing trial for treason, Davis, fifty-eight, gave every appearance of being bent and broken. A reporter from Kentucky described him as “a gaunt and feeble-looking man,” wearing a soft black hat and a sober black suit, as if he were a corpse. He’d spent two years in a military prison. He wanted to be released. A good many Americans wanted him dead. “We’ll hang Jeff Davis from a sour-apple tree,” they sang to the tune of “John Brown’s Body.”

Davis knew the courthouse well. Richmond had been the capital of the Confederacy and the courthouse its headquarters. The rebel President and his cabinet had used the courtroom as a war room, covering its walls with maps. He’d used the judge’s chambers as his Presidential office. He’d last left that room on the night of April 2, 1865, while Richmond fell.

Two years later, when Davis doddered into that courtroom, many of the faces he saw were Black. Among the two hundred spectators, a quarter were Black freedmen. And then the grand jury filed in. Six of its eighteen members were Black, the first Black men to serve on a federal grand jury. Fields Cook, born a slave, was a Baptist minister. John Oliver, born free, had spent much of his life in Boston. George Lewis Seaton’s mother, Lucinda, had been enslaved at Mount Vernon. Cornelius Liggan Harris, a Black shoemaker, later recalled how, when he took his seat with the grand jury and eyed the defendant, “he looked on me and smiled.”

Not many minutes later, Davis walked out a free man, released on bail. And not too many months after that the federal government’s case against him fell apart. There’s no real consensus about why. The explanation that Davis’s lawyer Charles O’Conor liked best had to do with Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, known as the disqualification clause, which bars from federal office anyone who has ever taken an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and later “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” O’Conor argued that Section 3’s ban on holding office was a form of punishment and that to try Davis for treason would therefore amount to double jeopardy. It’s a different kind of jeopardy lately. In the aftermath of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, legal scholars, including leading conservatives, have argued that the clause disqualifies Donald Trump from running for President. Challenges calling for Trump’s name to be blocked from ballots have been filed in twenty-eight states. Eleven cases have been dismissed by courts or voluntarily withdrawn. The Supreme Court might have the final say.

The American Presidency is draped in a red-white-and-blue cloak of impunity. Trump is the first President to have been impeached twice and the first ex-President to have been criminally indicted. If he’s convicted and sentenced and—unlikeliest of all—goes to prison, he will be the first in those dishonors, too. He faces four criminal trials, for a total of ninety-one felony charges. Thirty-four of those charges concern the alleged Stormy Daniels coverup, forty address Trump’s handling of classified documents containing national-defense information, and the remainder, divided between a federal case in Washington, D.C., and a state case in Georgia, relate to his efforts to overturn the 2020 Presidential election, including by inciting an armed insurrection to halt the certification of the Electoral College vote by a joint session of Congress. His very infamy is unprecedented.

The insurrection at the Capitol cost seven lives. The Civil War cost seven hundred thousand. And yet Jefferson Davis was never held responsible for any of those deaths. His failed conviction leaves no trail. Still, it had consequences. If Davis had been tried and convicted, the cloak of Presidential impunity would be flimsier. Leniency for Davis also bolstered the cause of white supremacy. First elected to the Senate, from Mississippi, in 1848, Davis believed in slavery, states’ rights, and secession, three ideas in one. Every state had a right to secede, Davis insisted in his farewell address to the Senate, in 1861, and Mississippi had every reason to because “the theory that all men are created free and equal” had been “made the basis of an attack upon her social institutions,” meaning slavery. Weeks later, Davis became the President of the Confederacy. His Vice-President, Alexander Stephens, said that the cornerstone of the new government “rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man.” Trump could win his Lost Cause, too.

Davis fled Richmond seven days before Robert E. Lee surrendered to Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox. “I’m bound to oppose the escape of Jeff. Davis,” Abraham Lincoln reportedly told General William Tecumseh Sherman, “but if you could manage to have him slip out unbeknownst-like, I guess it wouldn’t hurt me much.” After Lincoln was shot and killed, on April 15th, his successor, Andrew Johnson, issued a proclamation charging that Lincoln’s assassination had been “incited, concerted, and procured by” Davis and offering a reward of a hundred thousand dollars for his arrest.”

Union troops captured Davis in Georgia on May 10th as he attempted to sneak out of a tent while wearing his wife’s shawl. He was conveyed to a military prison in Virginia. Captain Henry Wirz, who had served as the commandant of an infamous Confederate prison in Andersonville, Georgia, where thirteen thousand Union soldiers died of starvation and exposure, was captured three days before Davis. Tried before a military commission, Wirz was found guilty and hanged.

From the start, the prosecution of the former rebel President was more complicated. “I never cease to regret that Jeff. Davis was not shot at the time of his capture,” the dauntless Massachusetts senator Charles Sumner said. Sumner wanted Davis tried, like Wirz, before a military commission. “I am anxiously looking forward to Jefferson Davis’s Trial,” the Columbia law professor Francis Lieber wrote to Sumner at the close of Wirz’s trial. But “suppose he is not found guilty; is he not, in that case, completely restored to his citizenship, and will he not sit by your side again in the Senate? And be the Democratic candidate for the next presidency? I do not joke.”

Lieber, who grew up in Prussia, had taught at South Carolina College for twenty years before moving to Columbia, in 1857. “Behold in me the symbol of civil war,” he once wrote. A son of his who fought for the Confederacy had been killed; another, who fought for the Union, had lost an arm. During the war, Lieber had prepared a set of rules of war that Lincoln issued as General Orders 100, better known as the Lieber Code. (It later formed the framework of the Geneva Convention.) Edwin Stanton, the Secretary of War, appointed Lieber to head the newly created Archive Office, charged with collecting Confederate records. Lieber fully expected to find evidence showing a “perfect connexion” between Davis and Lincoln’s assassination. That evidence was not forthcoming. Johnson vacillated, but by the end of 1865 he decided that he wanted Davis tried not for war crimes but for treason.

The Constitution defines treason as levying war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to its enemies. If Davis couldn’t be convicted of treason, the Philadelphia Inquirer remarked, “we may as well . . . expunge at once the word from our dictionaries.” Although Congress had modified the definition of treason in 1862, there remained ambiguity about what distinguished it from rebellion or insurrection. Lieber hoped that the prosecution would “stamp treason as treason,” but he was worried. “The whole Rebellion is beyond the Constitution,” he maintained. “The Constitution was not made for such a state of things.” In 1864, he quietly circulated to Congress a list of proposed constitutional amendments, including one that would end slavery, or what became the Thirteenth Amendment. (“Let us have no ‘slavery is dead,’ ” he wrote to Sumner. “It is not dead. Nothing is dead until it is killed.”) He also proposed an amendment guaranteeing equal rights regardless of race, or what became the Fourteenth Amendment. And he proposed an amendment clarifying the relationship between treason and rebellion: “It shall be a high crime directly to incite to armed resistance to the authority of the United States, or to establish or to join Societies or Combinations, secret or public, the object of which is to offer armed resistance to the authority of the United States, or to prepare for the same by collecting arms, organizing men, or otherwise.” Lieber’s Insurrection Amendment was never ratified. If it had been, Americans would live in a very different country.

Can Donald Trump get a fair trial? Is trying Trump the best thing for the nation? Is the possibility of acquittal worth the risk? Every trial on charges related to the insurrection gives him a stage for making the case that he won the 2020 election, any acquittal will be taken as a vindication, and his supporters will question the legitimacy of any conviction. But failure to try him is an affront not only to democracy but to decency.

In 1865, plenty of Americans wanted Davis tried without delay. A rope-maker from Illinois wrote to Johnson, volunteering to make the rope to hang him. But U.S. Attorney General James Speed, belying his name, wanted to slow things down. Americans were still mourning Lincoln and all that they had lost in the war. Speed, cautious by nature, wanted temperatures to cool. Many feared that bringing Davis to trial risked handing a rather stunning victory to the defeated Confederacy, as the legal historian Cynthia Nicoletti argued in a brilliant and exhaustively researched 2017 book, “Secession on Trial: The Treason Prosecution of Jefferson Davis.” To a charge of treason, Davis was expected to respond that he had forfeited his American citizenship when Mississippi seceded from the United States, and you cannot commit treason against another country. According to Nicoletti, the worry that an acquittal would have established the constitutionality of secession meant that interest in prosecuting Davis simply evaporated. There are other views. In a 2019 book, “Treason on Trial: The United States v. Jefferson Davis,” Robert Icenhauer-Ramirez, a former criminal-defense attorney, wrote that the prosecution unravelled because the men involved in it had towering political ambitions and were unwilling to risk losing so prominent a case. Neither explanation covers all the facts.”

From The New Yorker

“Jefferson F. Davis (June 3, 1808 – December 6, 1889) was an American politician who served as the first and only president of the Confederate States of America from 1861 to 1865. He represented Mississippi in the United States Senate and the House of Representatives as a member of the Democratic Party before the American Civil War. He was the United States Secretary of War from 1853 to 1857.

Davis, the youngest of ten children, was born in Fairview, Kentucky, but spent most of his childhood in Wilkinson County, Mississippi. His eldest brother Joseph Emory Davis secured the younger Davis’s appointment to the United States Military Academy. Upon graduating, he served six years as a lieutenant in the United States Army. After leaving the army in 1835, Davis married Sarah Knox Taylor, daughter of general and future President Zachary Taylor. Sarah died from malaria three months after the wedding. Davis became a cotton planter, building Brierfield Plantation in Mississippi on his brother Joseph’s land and eventually owning as many as 113 slaves.

In 1845, Davis married Varina Howell. During the same year, he was elected to the United States House of Representatives, serving for one year. From 1846 to 1847, he fought in the Mexican–American War as the colonel of a volunteer regiment. He was appointed to the United States Senate in 1847, resigning to unsuccessfully run as governor of Mississippi. In 1853, President Franklin Pierce appointed him Secretary of War. After Pierce’s administration ended in 1857, Davis returned to the Senate. He resigned in 1861 when Mississippi seceded from the United States.

During the Civil War, Davis guided the Confederacy’s policies and served as its commander in chief. When the Confederacy was defeated in 1865, Davis was captured, accused of treason, and imprisoned at Fort Monroe. He was released without trial after two years. Immediately after the war, Davis was often blamed for the Confederacy’s defeat, but after his release from prison, he became a hero of the Lost Cause of the Confederacy. In the late 19th and the 20th centuries, his legacy as Confederate leader was celebrated in the South. In the twenty-first century, he is frequently criticized as a supporter of slavery and racism, and many of the memorials dedicated to him throughout the United States have been removed.”

From Wikipedia

As Jill Lepore already mentioned in this video, Jefferson Davis wasn’t tried for treason against the United States of America, because he renounced his American citizenship, when he became the President of the Confederate States, which of course was at war with the U.S. Government in the 1960s during the American Civil War.

That’s not the case with Donald J. Trump, who obviously is still an American citizen (as much as lot of Americans hate that fact and consider him an embarrassment to the country) and therefor is eligible to be tried for treason and insurrection, for his role in overthrowing the democratically, certified 2020 presidential election.

I don’t think there’s any question that Donald Trump has to be tried for his role in the 2021 insurrection, both in Washington and Atlanta, at least. Apparently Michigan, Nevada, and perhaps Pennsylvania, are considering their own prosecutions against the former President as well.

The reason why Donald Trump has to be tried for his role in January 6, 2021, is because if he weren’t at least tried, (and I’m very confident he’ll be convicted in Washington, at least) it would send a horrible signal to the rest of the far-right in America, that they could do this again in the future. As well as the militant far-left, who aren’t exactly in love with American liberal democracy either.

Posted in Amanpour & Company, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Karen F. Agnifilo & Danya Perry: ‘Jack Smith STUNS DONALD TRUMP With POWERFUL New Motion, Reveals NEW CRIMES’

Meidas Touch_ Jack Smith STUNS Donald TRUMP With POWERFUL New Motion, Reveals NEW CRIMESSource:Meidas Touch– left to right: U.S. DOJ Special Counsel Jack Smith & Defendant Don Trump.

Source:The New Democrat

“The ladies of Legal AF, Karen Friedman Agnifilo and Danya Perry, break down a new Jack Smith motion where he spells out all of the uncharged bad acts and crimes Jack Smith wants to introduce at the March trial in the Jan 6th election case.”

From the Meidas Touch

What Karen Agnifilo and Danya Perry are talking about is Jack Smith’s motion to present evidence of Donald Trump’s prior bad acts, to the Washington Jan 6. 2021 insurrection case against former President Donald Trump. Crimes that the former President has been indicted for, while he was still in office, for the last 2 weeks of his presidency, back in January, 2021.

And as the ladies had already explained, prosecutors can only do this, if the prior bad acts, represents a pattern that the defendant has committed, to commit the current crimes that he’s being charged with.

“Special counsel Jack Smith wants a Washington, D.C. jury to hear about Donald Trump’s efforts to sow false doubts about the two presidential elections that preceded his failed 2020 campaign.

The special counsel’s team says Trump’s previous attempts to convince Americans that the elections of 2012 and 2016 were being stolen laid the foundation for what would become a criminal effort to overturn the 2020 election after his loss to Joe Biden.

“They demonstrate the defendant’s common plan of falsely blaming fraud for election results he does not like,” senior assistant special counsel Molly Gaston wrote in a nine-page court filing.

Smith is seeking permission from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to introduce evidence that isn’t specifically charged in the criminal indictment but may be relevant to the jury’s consideration of the alleged crimes. These details, known as 404(b) evidence, are commonly introduced in criminal matters to aid the jury’s ability to consider a defendant’s intent or motive based on uncharged “bad acts.” In this case, Smith says the evidence will help jurors assess Trump’s intent during the frenzied weeks before the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, as he sought to subvert the election.

The false election fraud claims from prior years aren’t the only streams of 404(b) evidence that prosecutors want to introduce. Gaston indicated that they intend to tell jurors about Trump’s repeated refusals in 2016 and 2020 to commit to a peaceful transfer of power. They want to introduce his September 2020 exhortation to the Proud Boys to “stand back and stand by,” which became a call to action for the group’s leaders at the time and put the group on a path to becoming an integral part of the Jan. 6 breach of the Capitol.

Prosecutors also say Trump engaged in a campaign of retaliation against Republican Party allies who refused to countenance his claims of election fraud — including the former legal counsel of the RNC.

Prosecutors also reiterated that they anticipate telling jurors about Trump’s efforts to align himself with Jan. 6 rioters in the years following the violence. Trump has described them as “hostages,” vowed to consider pardoning many of them, complained of the sentences doled out even to the most serious offenders and even recorded a song with some of the most violent riot defendants housed at the D.C. jail.

“This evidence shows that the rioters’ disruption of the certification proceeding is exactly what the defendant intended on January 6,” Gaston wrote.

Trump spent the days and weeks leading up to the 2012 election — when President Barack Obama would best GOP nominee Mitt Romney to win reelection — complaining without basis that voting machines were being manipulated or that the election was being tainted by fraud. In 2016, before winning the White House, Trump began to argue that Republicans were “naïve” not to think rampant cheating was occurring.”

From POLITICO

Posted in Meidas Touch, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

CNN: Anderson Cooper 360: Liz Cheney: ‘This is Speaker Johnson’s Vulnerability’

CNN_ Liz Cheney_ This is Speaker Johnson's VulnerabilitySource:CNN– former U.S. Representative (Republican, Wyoming) and now author Liz Cheney, talking about Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (Republican, Louisiana)

Source:The New Democrat

“CNN’s Anderson Cooper speaks with former Republican congresswoman Liz Cheney, who explains her suspicions about why Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) wants to blur footage of the January 6 riot to protect rioters’ identities.”

From CNN

As my colleague Kire Schneider said on The New Democrat yesterday:

“Before you look at Liz Cheney’s opposition to Donald Trump and his MAGA movement, you have to look at where she’s from politically, her family, especially her father Dick Cheney represents and what that wing of the party represents, first.

Even after Donald Trump lost the 2020 presidential election, you still had old school, center-right Republicans in Congress (House & Senate) who still believed in the rule of law and that America was more important than anything, including their own political careers. A lot of those folks are now out of Congress like former Representative Adam Kinzinger and former Representative Liz Cheney who lost her primary, but Senator Mitt Romney is still there.

Liz Cheney and her father represent the old school wing of the Republican Party, the party when it was the Grand Ole Party. They come from neoconservative wing of that party that emerged in the 1960s and 70s, but these are old school Republicans that believe in the rule of law, checks and balances, American democracy, and I could go on.

Liz Cheney and her father Dick also represent the Grand Ole Party…

And being the wannabe, right-wing authoritarian that Donald Trump wants to be, he obviously doesn’t believe in American democracy and accountability, at least as it applies to him. So it’s obvious why someone like a Liz Cheney would be in complete opposition to him.”

As Liz Cheney said about Speaker Mike Johnson and the House videotapes on Jan. 6, 2021: “The Department of Justice already has the tapes of that day.” What I would add is that people have already been arrested, prosecuted, and even testified in court, in exchange for lighter prison sentences, about their role in this attempted insurrection of 2021.

And as Liz Cheney would go onto say: “Speaker Johnson seems to be suggesting that there’s something in these tapes that could change what has already happened.”

So the Speaker is just lying about this since he knows that DOJ already has all of this evidence. But apparently Speaker Johnson thinks these MAGA members are too dumb to find their own hands, perhaps even spell their own names, and don’t already know this and that the Speaker can use this to try to keep their support.

But apparently Speaker Johnson is simply worried about keeping the support of the MAGA base of the Republican Party, and will claim that he’s with holding evidence that DOJ already has, in order to keep more of these people from having to go to prison, for their role in Jan 6. 2021. Even though several of the members are in prison today, or have just been released from prison, for their role in Jan 6. 2021.

Which tells me that the so-called establishment leaders of the Republican Party, like the freakin Speaker of the House of Representatives, (just to use as an example) doesn’t have a lot of respect for the intelligence of these right-wing, MAGA militants.

Posted in CNN, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

NPR News: ‘Liz Cheney Warns Democracy Is At Stake If Donald Trump Is Reelected’

Liz Cheney Warns Democracy Is At Stake If Trump Is Reelected _ Morning Edition _ NPRSource:NPR News anchor Leila Fadel interviewing former U.S. Representative & now author Liz Cheney (Republican, Wyoming)

Source:The New Democrat

“Republican Liz Cheney has made no secret of her criticism of former President Donald Trump. It’s what made her an outcast in her own party and cost her her job in Congress last year. Now, with Trump leading the polls in the 2024 Republican primary, Cheney is ramping up her efforts to keep him out of the Oval Office. She tells NPR’s Morning Edition she hasn’t ruled out her own presidential run in 2024 for that reason. In her new book, “Oath and Honor: A Memoir and a Warning,” she gives a no-holds-barred account from inside the Republican party of the days before and after Jan. 6., Trump’s efforts to remain in office after losing the 2020 election and her often-lonely role in trying to thwart them.”

From NPR News

“National Public Radio (NPR, stylized in all lowercase) is an American non-profit media organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., with its NPR West headquarters in Culver City, California.[2] It serves as a national syndicator to a network of over 1,000 public radio stations in the United States.[3] It differs from other non-profit membership media organizations, such as the Associated Press, in that it was established by an act of Congress.[4]

Funding for NPR comes from dues and fees paid by member stations, underwriting from corporate sponsors and annual grants from the publicly funded Corporation for Public Broadcasting.[5] Most of its member stations are owned by non-profit organizations, including public school districts, colleges, and universities. NPR operates independently of any government or corporation, and has full control of its content.[6]

NPR produces and distributes both news and cultural programming. The organization’s flagship shows are two drive-time news broadcasts: Morning Edition and the afternoon All Things Considered, both carried by most NPR member stations, and among the most popular radio programs in the country.[7][8] As of March 2018, the drive-time programs attract an audience of 14.9 million and 14.7 million per week, respectively.[9]

NPR manages the Public Radio Satellite System, which distributes its programs and other programming from independent producers and networks such as American Public Media and Public Radio Exchange, and which also acts as a primary entry point for the Emergency Alert System. Its content is also available on-demand online, on mobile networks, and in many cases, as podcasts.[10] Several NPR stations also carry programs from British public broadcaster BBC World Service.”

From Wikipedia

Before you look at Liz Cheney’s opposition to Donald Trump and his MAGA movement, you have to look at where she’s from politically, her family, especially her father Dick Cheney represents and what that wing of the party represents, first.

Even after Donald Trump lost the 2020 presidential election, you still had old school, center-right Republicans in Congress (House & Senate) who still believed in the rule of law and that America was more important than anything, including their own political careers. A lot of those folks are now out of Congress like former Representative Adam Kinzinger and former Representative Liz Cheney who lost her primary, but Senator Mitt Romney is still there.

Liz Cheney and her father represent the old school wing of the Republican Party, the party when it was the Grand Ole Party. They come from neoconservative wing of that party that emerged in the 1960s and 70s, but these are old school Republicans that believe in the rule of law, checks and balances, American democracy, and I could go on.

Here’s a good look at Liz Cheney’s wing of the Republican Party:

“Neoconservatism is a political movement that began in the United States and the United Kingdom during the 1960s during the Vietnam War among foreign policy hawks who became disenchanted with the increasingly pacifist Democratic Party and with the growing New Left and counterculture of the 1960s, particularly the Vietnam protests. Neoconservatives typically advocate the unilateral promotion of democracy and interventionism in international affairs, grounded in a militaristic and realist philosophy of “peace through strength.” They are known for espousing disdain for communism and political radicalism.[1][2]

Many adherents of neoconservatism became politically influential during the Republican presidential administrations of the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s and 2000s, peaking in influence during the administration of George W. Bush, when they played a major role in promoting and planning the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Prominent neoconservatives in the George W. Bush administration included Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Richard Perle and Paul Bremer.

Although U.S Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld had not self-identified as neoconservatives, they worked closely alongside neoconservative officials in designing key aspects of George W. Bush’s foreign policy; especially in their support of Israel, promotion of American influence in the Arab World and launching the “War on Terror”.[3] Bush administration’s domestic and foreign policies were heavily influenced by major ideologues affiliated with neo-conservatism, such as Bernard Lewis, Lulu Schwartz, Daniel Pipes, David Horowitz, Robert Kagan, etc.[4]

Critics of neoconservatism have used the term to describe foreign policy and war hawks who support aggressive militarism or neo-imperialism. Historically speaking, the term neoconservative refers to those who made the ideological journey from the anti-Stalinist left to the camp of American conservatism during the 1960s and 1970s.[5] The movement had its intellectual roots in the magazine Commentary, edited by Norman Podhoretz.[6] They spoke out against the New Left, and in that way helped define the movement.”

From Wikipedia

Liz Cheney and her father Dick also represent the Grand Ole Party:

“The initials synonymous with the Republican Party—“GOP”—stand for “grand old party.” As early as the 1870s, politicians and newspapers began to refer to the Republican Party as both the “grand old party” and the “gallant old party” to emphasize its role in preserving the Union during the Civil War. The Republican Party of Minnesota, for instance, adopted a platform in 1874 that it said “guarantees that the grand old party that saved the country is still true to the principles that gave it birth.”

In spite of its nickname, though, the “grand old party” was only a mere teenager in the early 1870s since the Republican Party had been formed in 1854 by former Whig Party members to oppose the expansion of slavery into western territories.”

From History

Donald Trump represents what’s called the “Make America Great Again Movement”. Which really means make America Anglo-Saxon and Northern European again, as well as male dominant:

“MAGA movement, nativist political movement that emerged in the United States during the 2016 presidential campaign of its putative leader, Donald Trump. Its name is derived from Trump’s 2016 campaign slogan “Make America Great Again,” which became a rallying cry for many Trump supporters during his candidacy, presidency (2017–21), and beyond.

The MAGA movement (often referred to simply as MAGA, or Make America Great Again), was founded on the belief that the United States was once a “great” country but has lost this status owing to foreign influence, both within its borders (via immigration and multiculturalism) and without (via globalization, or the increased integration of multiple national economies). MAGA members think that this fall from grace can be reversed through “America first” policies that would provide a greater degree of economic protectionism, greatly reduce immigration, particularly from developing countries, and encourage or enforce what MAGA members consider to be traditional American values. Some MAGA-supported policies, such as Trump’s call in 2015 for a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States,” would involve egregious racial or religious discrimination. (Some of the policies eventually adopted by the Trump administration did entail such discriminatory treatment of nonwhite immigrants; see below.)

In addition to its political stances, the MAGA movement is known for its particularly combative character, which exemplifies the extreme partisanship of contemporary American politics. In keeping with that stance, controversial rhetoric has flourished within the movement, including messages that critics see as homophobic, sexist, or racist or as inciting violence.”

From Britannica

And being the wannabe, right-wing authoritarian that Donald Trump wants to be, he obviously doesn’t believe in American democracy and accountability, at least as it applies to him. So it’s obvious why someone like a Liz Cheney would be in complete opposition to him.

Posted in NPR News, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Harry Litman: ‘Donald Trump Lawyer Makes PREPOSTEROUS CLAIM in Hearing in Front of GA Judge’

Harry Litman_ Donald Trump Lawyer Makes PREPOSTEROUS CLAIM in Hearing in Front of GA JudgeSource:Harry Litman– left to right: (flor all you blind, insane, drunk, and high people out there, just waking up from a coma) Fulton County, Georgia Judge Scott McAfee & Defendant Don Trump.

Source:The New Democrat

“Judge Scott McAfee heard arguments from Trump’s lawyer Steven Sadow on Friday. Sadow argued the Georgia trial should be delayed — if Trump wins the election, he says, it should be delayed until after Trump leaves the White House.”

From Harry Litman

I think we now need to get into what Donald Trump is actually doing here and why he’s even running for President, because it’s not the job that he wants again, just the power, and the added power that he would try to give himself, if there are enough Americans on Election Day 2024, who are too drunk and blind, to make the right decision 11 months from now and Donald Trump becomes President again.

Donald Trump’s 2024 election campaign and theme is essentially this:

“You have to reelect me, so I can stay out of prison. If I get reelected President, I could then end all the Federal trials and investigations against me and my allies and we can then go about our business and back to business as usual, with no one around to hold me and and my people accountable. But, if I don’t get back to The White House, I’m going to prison for at least the rest of my political career and I’ll be 78 in 2024.”

That’s what al these bogus (to be too kind) political motions that his lawyers are making in Washington and Atlanta, for their client Donald Trump. They’re essentially telling a very competent, responsible, and sober U.S. Federal Judge Tanya Chutkan and a very competent, responsible, and sober Fulton County, Georgia Judge Scott McAfee, that their client is immune from prosecution and trial, simply because he’s running for President again.

Forget about all the evidence against DJT in Washington and Atlanta, Donald Trump (according to his lawyers) is immune from prosecution and trial, simply because he’s running for President again.

Forget about the fact that DJT is running for President again. DJT’s lawyers might as well just say that Donald Trump can’t be prosecuted, because he’s Donald Trump and he’s the King of the United States (not reality TV) and therefor has the right to live and operate above the law. Because that argument makes as much sense as what they’re saying now.

Posted in Harry Litman, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Michael Popok: ‘STUNNED Donald Trump Makes DESPERATE Filing After GAG Reinstatement’

Meidas Touch_ STUNNED Donald Trump Makes DESPERATE Filing After GAG ReinstatementSource:Meidas Touch– in case it’s not obvious enough (perhaps you just happen to be drunk, insane, or blind) left to right: NY State Judge Arthur Engeron & the one and thank God only, Donald J. Trump.

Source:The New Democrat

“Trump’s lawyers, cutting and pasting from their DC appeal filing, have filed an emergency petition to have NY’s highest appellate court remove the gag order to allow his lawyers and him to bash the judge’s imperiled law clerk some more. Michael Popok of Legal AF explains what goes wrong with the new filing and why it is likely to lose.”

From the Meidas Touch

If this New York State courtroom that’s run by Judge Arthur Engeron, was one of Donald Trump’s so-called reality TV shows, Mr. Trump would have freedom to say whatever the hell he wanted too. Not just about the Judge, but the Judge’s law clerk as well. Mr. Trump could call the Judge a whore and his wife a whore, his clerk a crazy bitch and threaten to kick their asses when after the court session is over, etc, while court is in session. Wouldn’t even have to wait for a press conference after court.

But Donald Trump no longer lives in reality TV world. At least physically, whether that’s ever occurred to him mentally or not, only DJT could know that. And in the United States of America, more pacifically in Manhattan, New York, in New York State Court, in the real world, every individual right that we have in America, including the First Amendment, (my personal favorite individual right) is not absolute.

Imagine if free speech was unlimited in America:

How would people who hire killers to murder their spouse or someone else, be charged for conspiracy to commit murder? The defendant could just say: “I didn’t personally murder my spouse. I just hired someone to do that for me. I have a First Amendment right to say whatever I want.”

Perjurers could never be charged for perjury because perjurers would have a 1st Amendment right to lie under oath.

Inciting violence would then become legal in America because now we have a constitutional right to incite violence. Someone could give a speech and say: “You should go beat the hell out of Joe Wilson (or whoever the person is) because that would make me happy.” And then someone would get go beat the hell out of Joe Wilson and say that Tom Davis (or whoever the person is) said that would make them happy. And then Tom Davis could just say: “Well, I didn’t beat the hell out of Joe Wilson. I just said someone should go do that.”

Forget about truth in advertising with an unlimited First Amendment in America because now con people fraudsters, crooks, would no longer be required to have to back up what they claim their products can do. A car dealer could then claim that their cars are the most reliable and durable around. Even though they break down 5 minutes after their customers pull their new car out of the lot. The car dealership could just say: “We didn’t force these people to buy our cars or even take us seriously.”

If Donald Trump’s lawyers were honest, (and if rats flew over the moon) they would simply just argue: “Donald Trump has the constitutional right to say and do whatever he wants to do.” That would still be a garbage defense, but at least it would be honest.

As Michael Popok, who is a New York lawyer, said in his video, once you enter the courtroom as a defendant, your free speech rights become limited to the case and the evidence in that case. (Close paraphrase) You don’t have the right to attack the Judge and the Judge’s staff.

Posted in Meidas Touch, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Real Time With Bill Maher: Overtime: James Carville & Dave Rubin

Real Time With Bill Maher_ Overtime_ James Carville & Dave RubinSource:Real Time With Bill Maher– left to right: The Rajin Cajun James Carville& The Liberal Jew David Rubin. (Not to get too ethnic)

Source:The New Democrat

“Bill and his guests continue their conversation about anti-Semitism, the U.S. economy, Christian nationalism and more.”

From Real Time With Bill Maher

As far as the Far-Right in America, (I’m tired of calling people who aren’t religious Christian Nationalists) we can joke about them as much as we want and make fun of them all we want. Like the fact that they’re from the 1800s culturally and as far as their mindset and got caught in some political, cultural, and national time machine and found themselves in the 21st Century, where it suddenly occurred to them that not all Americans are even Anglo-Saxon-Protestants, and they have some problem with that, along with all the other races, cultures, religions, and other ethnicities that make up America.

But, when political jokes get elected to high office in America and you have a party of political jokes not only getting elected to Congress, but The White House as well, but in such big numbers that now they’re in charge of the national government, no decent, intelligent, sane, and sober American would still be laughing.

The old joke: “The problem with political jokes, is that they get elected.” Once they’re elected and in office and now have power to rule over people who are no longer laughing at them and now are thinking: “If only I had voted during that last election, I could’ve been laughing at this asshole on election night” it’s no longer funny, because now you have all these mentally out of this world people, who not only have the power to govern, but to rule over other people.

MAGA, even the militant wing of the movement, is no real threat to America, as long as they’re just getting elected in West Virginia and the rest of Redneckistan. (To keep it real) But once they start getting elected in places where not just mainstream Democrats should win, but win going away, like in Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, etc, and in places where center-right Republicans should be getting elected, like in Arizona, Nevada, Ohio, New York State, etc, that’s when MAGA becomes a threat to the rest of the country.

Outside of Redneckistan, (to keep it real) MAGA is just a small part of a much larger Republican Party. But once they start winning in the rest of America, where the rest of the country lives, like in cities, and metros, that’s how they become a problem for the rest of the country. Because now they have the numbers to at least be in charge of the House of Representatives, but perhaps win back the Senate, and even The White House.

My point here is for every intelligent, responsible, sober, and sane American, who really loves America and our great liberal democracy and republic, make fun of MAGA all you want. But on election day make sure you are at least serious and sober enough to get out and vote and vote for the pro-American, anti-MAGA candidates, even if they’re not from your political party. Because that’s how we really “save America” and our republic and keep our great country from going back to the 1950s where MAGA wants to take us back.

Posted in Real Time, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Michael Cohen: ‘Donald Trump Gets SHUT UP by Court & Caught RED-HANDED’

Meidas Touch_ Donald Trump gets SHUT UP by Court and Caught RED-HANDED, Michael Cohen STRIKES BACKSource:Meidas Touch– yes, I can believe that Michael Cohen used to work for Donald J. Trump. But then he goes to prison for him, because he tried to cover up one of DJT’s crimes. Sometimes prison rehabilitation actually works.

Source:The New Democrat

“Michael Cohen reacts to Trump’s Gag order being reinstated in New York as a court appointed monitor in the same trial, informed the court of $40 million in undisclosed cash transfer by the Trump Org.”

From the Meidas Touch

“Embezzlement is a term commonly used for a type of financial crime, usually involving theft of money from a business or employer. It often involves a trusted individual taking advantage of their position to steal funds or assets, most commonly over a period of time.”

From Wikipedia

“Money laundering is the process of illegally concealing the origin of money, obtained from illicit activities such as drug trafficking, corruption, embezzlement or gambling, by converting it into a legitimate source. It is a crime in many jurisdictions with varying definitions. It is usually a key operation of organized crime.”

From Wikipedia

Michael Cohen Said: “For the first time in his life, Donald Trump is learning about accountability and what it’s like to be held accountable under law.” (That’s a close paraphrase)

As my colleague Fred Schneider said on The New Democrat back in September:

“I said back in 2017 (and I just wish I had written this down and made it public) that Donald Trump picked the wrong country to run for President and be its head of state. Why? Because our governmental system that’s built around checks and balances, accountability, the rule of law, is not suited for someone of Donald Trump’s mindset and personality. He believes he can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants to, that rules and laws that apply to everyone else, don’t apply to him.”

I post the links about embezzlement and money laundering for excellent reasons. I think it’s fairly obvious now that Donald Trump personally, (perhaps not his company) is strapped for cash. Even when you move money from a company that you personally own, like Trump Organization, (in Donald Trump’s case) into your own personal account, it’s still embezzlement. When you illegally try to hide money and in Donald Trump’s case, to avoid paying taxes on it, that’s money laundering. And as Mr. Cohen already said, Donald Trump was caught redhanded in both cases.

Posted in Meidas Touch, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment