John M. Newman: Dangerous Crossing (1953)

Brian F: Dangerous Crossing 1953 TrailerSource:Brian F– sometimes a picture actually does say it all.

Source:The New Democrat

“Dangerous Crossing 1953 Trailer”

From Brian F

“When a beautiful bride boards an ocean liner with her new husband, he goes into hiding, and she becomes the target of a murder conspiracy.”

From IMDB

I think perhaps the thing I love the most about this film, other than it being a 75 minute film that flies by and not just because it’s so short. But it’s so exciting, where you really don’t have an opportunity to take a break, other than waiting for a commercial or hitting pause. But the thing that I really love about this film is that it doesn’t have a lot of do’s and don’t’s. It just has a lot of don’t’s. Which I’m going to explain to you.

The IMDB description is pretty good. But there’s a lot more to it. Ruth Stanton (played by the beautiful and too cute Jeanne Crain) just lost her father, who she still misses terribly. And she falls in love with John Bowman (played by Carl Betz) pretty much right after she loses her father. Ruth’s father had a business that he left to her daughter, as well as good deal of money.

So now Ruth Stanton is pretty vulnerable because Bowman knows all about this, but his brand new wife doesn’t know him. Which comes back to be a big problem for her after he ditches her just after they arrive on the boat together. Because she can not only not find him, but has no idea what happened to him, and she has a helluva a story to try to explain to the ships’s crew, who simply thinks that he got off the boat because there’s no sign of him and perhaps he just ditched her.

So now Ruth is in a situation where the only person on the boat whose willing to try to believe her and help her figure out what happened is the ship’s doctor. (Played by Michael Rennie) While the rest of the ship is thinks she’s going crazy, or simply making all this up. Not knowing that there’s a whole plan here that was put together by her husband to make it look like she’s going crazy and he has one of the ship’s stewardess’s in on the scheme with him.

The don’t’s of this story I think are pretty obvious:

Don’t fall in love with people you barley know.

Don’t go on a cruise with someone you barely know.

Don’t marry people you barely know.

But if Ruth Stanton played it straight and smart, there wouldn’t have been this great and exciting film noir, that I’ve seen maybe 10 times in the last 8-9 years. And I wouldn’t be writing about it today.

Posted in Classic Movies, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

George Schaefer: Doctors Wives (1971)

Video Detective: Doctors Wives (1971)Source:Video Detective– one of the sex scenes in Doctors Wives.

Source:The New Democrat

“Starring: Carroll O’Connor, Dyan Cannon, Gene Hackman, Janice Rule, Rachel Roberts, Richard Crenna

Official Content From Sony Pictures Home Entertainment

Lascivious soaper about the lives of a group of physicians in the bedroom as well as the operating room.

Movie, Doctors’ Wives Movie,Doctors’ Wives Trailer,Doctors’ Wives 1971, George Schaefer,Carroll O’Connor, Dyan Cannon, Gene Hackman, Janice Rule, Rachel Roberts, Richard Crenna”

From the Video Detective

“The dysfunctional marriages of several unhappy rich doctors who work at a private clinic and their neglected wives who deal with their own unhappiness in various ways enter crisis mode when one of them murders his cheating wife.”

From IMDB

The Video Detective gives you a solid look at who the main players in this film are. And the IMDB description gives you a solid look at what this film is about. Basically, wealthy, at least in early 1970s times, as well as today, millionaire doctors, even in today’s money, who are apparently more happy at work, than at home with their bored, unhappy wives.

The highlights of this film:

The Richard Crenna character has a mistress, who just happens to be his head nurse.

And if that’s not enough, this film takes a sharp turn, when one of the doctors in the film (played by John Colicos) murders his tramp wife (played by Dyan Cannon) after he catches her having sex at their home, with one of the pre-med students at the hospital.

And if that’s not enough, he not only has blackmail material on all the other doctors, that he threatens to use against him, if they don’t bail him out (so to speak) which he resorts to, after his his failed crime in the heat of passion defense fails.

But, there’s a young boy at the hospital, who just happens to be the son of Doctor Peter Brennan’s (played by Richard Crenna) mistress, who has to have a lifesaving surgery, that can only be performed by Doctor Mort Dellman. (Played by John Colicos) But, Doctor Dellman only agrees to perform this surgery, if the doctors help him escape after the surgery, instead of going back to jail.

And if that’s not enough, there’s a rumor about whether Doctor Brennan, is the father of his mistress’s son, the boy who needs this surgery to keep living.

So, if you are someone like me and you love great soap operas and you also love classic films, I think this is a great film. Think of a great episode, or a great series of episodes of General Hospital. But instead of that show really being about Port Charles, (which it really is) this movie is about the hospital and the people who work there. It’s a great story, with a great cast, and it’s also pretty funny as well.

This is a follow up piece about The Doctors Wives, from an earlier 2013 piece about this film, on The New Democrat.

Posted in Classic Movies, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

CSPAN: 1948 Thomas Dewey Republican Convention Acceptance Speech

CSPAN: 1948 Thomas Dewey Republican Convention Acceptance SpeechSource:CSPAN– Governor Thomas E. Dewey (Republican, New York) 1948 Republican nominee for President.

Source:The New Democrat

“1948 Thomas Dewey Republican Convention Acceptance Speech
June 24, 1948. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.”

From Kansas Politics

This is part of Governor Dewey’s 1948 RNC acceptance speech:

“To me, to be a Republican in this hour is to dedicate one’s life to the freedom of men. As long as the world is half free and half slave, we must peacefully labor to help men everywhere to achieve liberty.

We have declared our goal to be a strong and free America in a free world of free men—free to speak their own minds, free to develop new ideas, free to publish whatever they believe, free to move from place to place, free to choose their occupations, free to enjoy and to save and to use the fruits of their labor, and free to worship God, each according to his own concept of His grace and His mercy.

When these rights are secure in this world of ours, the permanent ideals of the Republican Party shall have been realized.

The ideals of the American people are the ideals of the Republican Party. We have tonight, and in these days which preceded, here in Philadelphia lighted a beacon, in this cradle of our own independence. We have lighted a beacon to give eternal hope that men may live in liberty with human dignity and before God, and loving Him, stand erect and free.”

From The Presidency

From what I wrote about Tom Dewey last week:

“I think to understand someone like Tom Dewey’s politics, you also have to understand the politics of the Republican Party back in the 1940s and 50s. And not just in New York, but the entire country as well.

In Tom Dewey’s time, being a Republican was about being in favor of the rule of law, strong national security, strong economy that benefited both workers and management, the U.S. Constitution, equal rights, equal justice, individual rights for everyone. That was what the Republican Party by en-large, before Richard Nixon’s silent majority movement of the late 1960s and early 1970s, that was made up of Dixiecrat Democrats who moved into the Republican Party in the 1960s and 70s. ”

From The New Democrat

I give you part of Tom Dewey’s speech here, because I want to give you an idea of how different the Republican Party of the late 1940s and really into the 1950s and perhaps even 1960s, when they really were the Grand Ole Party, a party that I probably could’ve been a member of back then, ideologically and how the MAGA Party (which is supposed to be the Republican Party today) is today.

Back then, when talking about religion and government, you didn’t hear people like Mike Flynn and Jack Posobiec, say that for America to be a nation under god, we can only have one religion. Or that we need to replace American democracy and the Constitution, with their interpretation of the Bible. And we need to become a Christian Nationalist State, instead of the federal liberal democratic republic that we are today.

I don’t mention any of these things to sound partisan, or sound like I hate Republicans, or I hate the Republican Party. I do hate the MAGA movement and what it stands for. I mention these things to point out that what’s supposed to pass as the Republican Party today, is not even Republican, let alone conservative.

The MAGA Party doesn’t even believe in Republicanism, let alone conserving the American Republic. They believe in what they call Christian Nationalism or Trumpism. Which is very anti-conservative, anti-Republican, anti-constitutional, and even Un-American. At least when you consider what they believe in and how their values goes against almost everything that America is supposed to stand for. As the great Ronald Reagan said: “The city on a shinning hill.”

Posted in C-SPAN, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The TV Time Machine: ‘Lee Grant Talks Columbo Peter Falk & Ransom for a Dead Man–Exclusive Interview!

The TV Time Machine: Lee Grant Talks Columbo Peter Falk and Ransom for a Dead Man--Exclusive Interview!Source:The TV Time Machine talking to Hollywood Goddess Lee Grant about her appearance on Columbo.

Source:The New Democrat

“Lee Grant talks about playing a Columbo murderer in the classic 1971 NBC TV movie Ransom for a Dead Man starring Peter Falk as Lieutenant Columbo with Scott Skelton, co-author (with Jim Benson) of the upcoming book, The Ultimate Columbo.

Ransom for a Dead Man aired on the NBC television network on March 1, 1971. Lee Grant played Leslie Williams, a high-powered attorney determined to rid herself of her insufferably dull husband by devising a phony kidnapping scheme as a means to murder said hubby and collect the associated ‘ransom.’

The character of Lieutenant Columbo was introduced in Dick Levinson and Bill Link’s stage play PRESCRIPTION: MURDER, which was itself an expansion of a teleplay they wrote for The Chevy Mystery Show in 1960 titled Enough Rope. Prescription: Murder later aired as an NBC World Premiere movie in 1968, with Peter Falk cast as the rumpled, seemingly absent-minded Lieutenant Columbo.

Written by Dean Hargrove (from a story by Richard Levinson and William Link), Ransom for a Dead Man was a suspenseful, stylish take on the Columbo character, marking the official pilot film for the popular, long-running TV series COLUMBO, a five-star classic if ever the medium produced one.”

From The TV Time Machine

To just talk about my own personal feelings about the Columbo TV/movie series and then I’ll get into Lee Grant and her appearance on this episode as well.

If you are a Gen-Xer or older (and I’m a Gen-Xer) you remember hearing about Star Trek conventions from the 1980s and perhaps even earlier. For anyone whose not familiar with Star Trek conventions, I don’t feel sorry for you for that. but to give you an idea about them:

Star Trek not when it originally aired in the late 1960s and early 70s on NBC, was not a popular TV series. I think it had 4 seasons and probably only did well enough to last that long. But go up to the late 1970s, by then it was very popular in syndication to the point that the Star Trek creators started a movie series about the TV series, with I believe 4 or 5 Star Trek films. By the late 80s,

Star Trek became so popular and the merchandise became so popular that a lot of fan groups and organizations were put together for the Star Trek the TV series and movie series. It gets to the point that these folks look like they were part of a national cult or something and became very easy to make fun of in pop culture.

To make a long point shorter, I’m not a Columbo version of a Trekkie. I think it’s one of the best, as well as funnest TV detective series ever. Peter Falk for me at least, is one of the best TV comedians ever. But, there’s only about 10 episodes from the entire series, including the original on NBC and the movie version from ABC in the 1990s, that I really love and can see over and over again, to the point that I now have 10-15 Columbo episodes on DVD and watch them whenever I have the time and want to watch them.

If I had to put a list of top 5 episodes all time in the entire Columbo series from both NBC and ABC, I think Ransom For a Deadman is not just top 5, but top 1. It’s between this episode and Murder By Book with Jack Cassidy, also from 1971, and Exercise in Fatality with Robert Conrad from 1974.

Lee Grant explains herself very well about what made her character so great and interesting to play and she plays Leslie Williams so perfectly. She plays a woman who almost seems like she doesn’t care if she gets caught or not. Too much confidence and as Lieutenant Columbo (played by Peter Falk) says so himself, she has no conscience. It’s almost as if she hated her husband and her stepdaughter that he gave her, to the point that she made it easier for Columbo to catch her.

But despite playing such a cold and evil woman, Lee Grant is not just Lee Grant, but she’ll always be Lee Grant. The only two people that Leslie could never get past, were Columbo and her stepdaughter Margaret. (Played by Pattye Mattlick) But, she had the rest of the Los Angeles Police Department and all her associates and colleagues fooled, because again she’s Lee Grant.

I think the best, or at least most interesting TV killers, are the killers who lack conscience, but who are also highly intelligent, but just from the outside you think: “Come, on, she can’t kill anybody.” And that’s what you get from Leslie. To the outside observer, she’s just too cute and sweet physically, to even swat at a fly that flies in her face, let alone not just murder someone, or her own husband, that she supposedly is in love with.

But this all gets back to Lee Grant being Lee Grant. She’s so good of an actress, that she can fool anybody. And because she looks so cute and sweet from the outside, she can fool anyone into thinking that no way she could murder someone.

Posted in Hollywood Goddess, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Bulwark: ‘George Conway Explains: SCOTUS Order Could Be BAD NEWS For Donald Trump It All’

The Bulwark: George Conway Explains: SCOTUS order could be BAD NEWS for Trump | George Conway Explains It AllSource:The Bulwark with Sarah Longwell & George Conway.

Source:The New Democrat

“George Conway explains to Sarah Longwell why he thinks everyone is wrong, and the Supreme Court’s decision to take up Trump’s immunity appeal could be bad news for Trump’s reelection bid. George also gives a lesson on immunity and the 14th Amendment.”

From The Bulwark

No offense, but George Conway predicted back in December, I believe, when Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to go past the Court of Appeals and straight to the Supreme Court. And of course SCOTUS denied that as well. And then he predicted in February, that the Supreme Court wouldn’t even take this case because the Court of Appeals opinion was strong and correct. And of course on Wednesday, that the Supreme Court decided to take the case. I still think he’s an excellent legal analyst, but he’s had two major mistakes here.

Again, I’m not a lawyer and I predicted that this would be 8-1 or 8-0 against Donald Trump, with perhaps just Justice Clarence Thomas ruling in favor of Trump. As I wrote on The New Democrat on Tuesday:

“I have my own theory here. Justice Thomas seems even more partisan than Justice Alito. We saw that during Donald Trump’s appeals to deny Joe Biden the election back in late 2020. He simply turned away a big case that then President Trump had and simply didn’t take that case and let the lower court ruling stand. Also, Justice Thomas’s wife Ginni, is all in when it comes to MAGA. She was part of the “stop the steal movement” in late 2020 and perhaps one of the organizers 2021 insurrection attempt.

My theory is that the Court has already ruled against Donald Trump. But they’re waiting on whether Justice Thomas will either vote no and go down 8-1 in one of the biggest cases in the history of the Court and be remembered as the one U.S. Justice who believes Donald Trump is above the law. And risk looking pretty bad, perhaps even corrupt and looking like a partisan politician, instead of a judge. Or, will he just recuse himself and not vote at all and save himself from a little historical embarrassment. But that’s my theory as an outsider in this case, whose not even a lawyer.”

From The New Democrat

So, I’ve been wrong about this as well. I think it’s all about when the Supreme Court decides this case. I think it’s an easy case because there’s no one whose above the law in America, including the President of the United States and that includes former President’s. So theoretically, SCOTUS could listen to the arguments in late April and then maybe rule on that 4 weeks later, because it’s hard to imagine how there’s 5 votes on SCOTUS who thinks that anyone in America is above the law.

If the Court ruled in favor of Donald J. Trump on presidential immunity, it would literally be saying that the Constitution doesn’t really exist and neither does the rule of law. At least for politicians that they’re more willing to vote for. And that would put the Court’s future in jeopardy.

If Joe Biden wins reelection anyway and Democrats win back the House and not just hold but add in the Senate, the next Congress and a reelected President Joe Biden could come back and say: “Now it’s time to expand the Supreme Court, because they now have a major credibility and trust issue.” And they would have a good case to make there. So I think it’s clear Donald Trump will lose on this. The question is how bad will the loss be for him.

Posted in The Bulwark, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Karen F. Agnifilo: ‘Donald Trump NY CRIMINAL Case Becomes MORE URGENT After Latest News’

Meidas Touch: Donald Trump NY CRIMINAL Case Becomes MORE URGENT After Latest NewsSource:Meidas Touch– left to right: Manhattan, NY District Attorney Alvin Bragg & Defendant Don.

Source:The New Democrat

“Former Prosecutor and Legal AF Host, Karen Friedman Agnifilo, reports on the Supreme Court’s decision to hear Trump’s appeal on Presidential Immunity and explains why all eyes now turn to the Manhattan DA Hush Money case.”

From the Meidas Touch

“Each count for which Trump is convicted could result in a prison sentence of up to four years, to be served consecutively, or the judge could impose no prison sentence.[114] A conviction would not legally prohibit Trump from continuing his campaign in the 2024 presidential election, nor would he be forbidden from assuming presidency should he win, even if he were in prison.[115] Trump stated in an April 2023 Fox News interview with Tucker Carlson that he would not drop his candidacy in the 2024 U.S. presidential election if he is convicted.”

From Wikipedia

I mostly agree with what Karen Friedman Agnifilso is saying here. But before I get into that, I just want to say something on behalf of The New Democrat.

Myself and my colleague Fred Schneider both predicted on The New Democrat this year, that the Supreme Court wouldn’t just deny Donald Trump’s bogus (to be kind) presidential immunity claim but that the Supreme Court wouldn’t even take that case. We would’ve talked about this yesterday, or one of us would have, but the story didn’t break to after 5PM. And we wanted to get more information on this story before we tried to put something on this blog.

Now again, I’m not a lawyer and if you are getting tired of hearing us say this, then we’re getting through. I don’t see how the Washington trial gets started and finished before election day. But, I still think that by August, or perhaps September, we could at least see the discovery portion of this trial of this case take place and we can see a lot of what Special Counsel Jack Smith and company have on Donald Trump in this case. Which is something that voters would be able to consider in deciding who to vote for during the election. And perhaps even the trial started. But the 2nd part is a bigger long shot.

So this is where I completely agree with Karen Agnifilo: Manhattan is now front and center. District Attorney Alvin Bragg has 34 felony counts against Donald J. Trump. Yes, this is the smallest and least important case against Donald Trump. But imagine a career mobster who has 4 separate felony cases against him, with a tone of solid evidence against him. And the crime that’s the least important against him, is an arson charge, where he’s charged with blowing up the offices of one his competitors, or something. But he’s also being charged with murder 1 or murder 2, rape, and being the lead conspirator of a bank robbery. That’s the world that Donald J. Trump now lives in.

If Donald Trump is just convicted of one the charges that Alvin Bragg has against him, he’s a convicted felon. Unless he wins that case on appeal, which might not be until a year later from after he’s convicted. But, any felony convictions after the 1st one, makes Donald Trump a serial felon, who thinks that he’s above the law, whose also running for President of the United States. I don’t see how that helps him, plus with all the evidence against him, not just in Manhattan, but in Washington as well, during the election.

You don’t see a lot of Independents rallying for career criminals to be President of the United States. Show me the people who are saying: “You know what, we need more criminals in our government, just to shake things up.” Because most Americans tend to not just believe in the rule of law, but the rule of law for everybody. And that includes not just the current President of the United States, but former President’s as well.

Posted in Meidas Touch, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Library of Congress: ‘The Dewey Story’

Library of Congress: The Thomas Dewey StorySource:Library of Congress with a short bio of Governor Thomas E. Dewey (Republican, New York)

Source:The New Democrat

“Summary: “The story of the career of Governor Thomas E. Dewey. Includes scenes taken from his private and political life and concludes with his nomination for president in 1948″–Summary from title card. Made for the Republican National Committee. ”

From the Library of Congress

“Remembered as “an odd mix, a pay-as-you-go liberal and a compassionate conservative”[49] and usually regarded as an honest and highly effective governor, Dewey doubled state aid to education, increased salaries for state employees and still reduced the state’s debt by over $100 million. He referred to his program as “pay-as-you-go liberalism … government can be progressive and solvent at the same time.”[50] Additionally he put through the Ives-Quinn Act of 1945, the first state law in the country that prohibited racial discrimination in employment. As governor, Dewey signed legislation that created the State University of New York. Shortly after becoming governor in 1943, Dewey learned that some state workers and teachers were being paid only $900 a year, leading him to give “hefty raises, some as high as 150%” to state workers and teachers.[51]

Dewey played a leading role in securing support and funding for the New York State Thruway, which was eventually named in his honor.[52] Dewey also streamlined and consolidated many state agencies to make them more efficient.[53] During the Second World War construction in New York was limited, which allowed Dewey to create a $623 million budget surplus, which he placed into his “Postwar Reconstruction Fund.” The fund would eventually create 14,000 new beds in the state’s mental health system, provide public housing for 30,000 families, allow for the reforestation of 34 million trees, create a water pollution program, provide slum clearance, and pay for a “model veterans’ program.”[51] His governorship was also “friendlier by far than his [Democratic] predecessors to the private sector”, as Dewey created a state Department of Commerce to “lure new businesses and tourists to the Empire State, ease the shift from wartime boom, and steer small businessmen, in particular, through the maze of federal regulation and restriction.”[37] Between 1945 and 1948, 135,000 new businesses were started in New York.[37]

Dewey supported the decision of the New York legislature to end state funding for child care centers, which were established during the war.[54] The child care centers allowed mothers to participate in wartime industries. The state was forced to provide funding for local communities that could not obtain money under the Lanham Act.[55] Although working mothers, helped by various civic and social groups, fought to retain funding, federal support for child care facilities was considered temporary and ended on March 1, 1946.[56] New York state aid to child care ended on January 1, 1948.[55] When protesters asked Dewey to keep the child care centers open, he called them “Communists.”[54]

He also strongly supported the death penalty. During his twelve years as governor, more than ninety people were electrocuted under New York authority. Among these were several of the mob-affiliated hitmen belonging to the murder-for-hire group Murder, Inc., which was headed up by major mob leaders Louis “Lepke” Buchalter and Albert Anastasia. Buchalter himself went to the chair in 1944.”

From Wikipedia

I think to understand someone like Tom Dewey’s politics, you also have to understand the politics of the Republican Party back in the 1940s and 50s. And not just in New York, but the entire country as well.

In Tom Dewey’s time, being a Republican was about being in favor of the rule of law, strong national security, strong economy that benefited both workers and management, the U.S. Constitution, equal rights, equal justice, individual rights for everyone. That was what the Republican Party by en-large, before Richard Nixon’s silent majority movement of the late 1960s and early 1970s, that was made up of Dixiecrat Democrats who moved into the Republican Party in the 1960s and 70s.

In Tom Dewey’s time, the Republican Party had a conservative wing that believed in conserving our form of government, our Constitution, national security, the American way of life for everyone. But it wasn’t an authoritarian wing who believes the U.S. Constitution is outdated and that not every American in equal, or that not every group in America is equal.

And this is going to sound as strange as sunbathers spotted in the North Pole, or people spotted going ice fishing in the desert or something, but the Republican Party also had a progressive wing that believed in the same values as the Conservative Republicans. But that government could be used to help create progress. But that if had to be efficient. And that the best government especially as it related to safety net and social policies, was the government that was closest to home. Which is where Tom Dewey fitted in to what today would be called a Progressive and perhaps even a Liberal Republican.

And when I say Progressive or Liberal, even in a Republican sense, I’m not talking about left-wing, revolutionary, hipsters, who want to change the world and try to eliminate everything that actually makes America great. And try to replace the American form of government with some type of socialist state. Those are actually the false stereotypes of what it means to be a Liberal or Progressive.

Progressive or even Liberal in the Republican sense, still sounds pretty conservative. Government should conserve, government should move cautiously when it comes to reform, government should be fiscally responsible, which means pay as you go. And when government helps people, it helps them get on their feet and expects people to do as much for themselves as they can.

That’s the kind of Republican that Tom Dewey was, along with Dwight Eisenhower, Nelson Rockefeller, even Richard Nixon, at least on national security, foreign, and even economic policy, and even George H.W. Bush, at least when he was in the House of Representatives in the late 1960s and even as President. Today, Senator Mitt Romney fits in that wing of the old Republican Party. But the Progressives are obviously not what’s called the Republican Party today.

Posted in Progressive, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Michael Popok: ‘Donald Trump CAN’T AFFORD to Pay MASSIVE DEBT, ADMITS He Is BROKE’

Meidas Touch: Donald Trump CAN’T AFFORD to Pay MASSIVE DEBT, ADMITS He Is BROKESource:Meidas Touch– left to right: New York State Judge Arthur Engoron & Defendant Don.

Source:The New Democrat

“Trump is so out of cash that his lawyer’s just had to admit in court filings that in order to come up with the over $500 million needed to stop enforcement of the NYAG civil fraud judgment he has to “sell assets” and “raise capital” and only has 25 percent of it now to put up in cash. Michael Popok explains what happens next when an emergency Justice of the appellate court decides today whether Trump should get a stay without posting ALL the money.”

From the Meidas Touch

As I wrote about this on Monday:

“No offense to Ben Meiselas’s statement here, but I think NY Attorney General Letitia James statement here is the key. I don’t believe she would make a statement like that, if she were expecting Donald Trump to be able to come up with the cash, or has the cash, to even come up with the bond that he has to have first, to even be eligible for 450 plus and growing, million dollar judgement against him in New York State.

The reason why I say this, is because the NY Attorney General probably not only has Mr. Trump’s business records and his Trump Organization’s business records, but she probably also has his personal financial records as well. She knows how much money this man is worth. And I”m not just talking about how much he’s personally worth. Not his properties, but how much money Donald J. Trump has in his personal bank accounts.

So it would be very foolish on Attorney General James part, to say that she’s ready to start seizing Trump properties, to pay off the judgement against him, if she believed that he could personally financially do this. She’s too good of a lawyer for that to make such a foolish statement like that. Mr. Trump, hasn’t even posted a bond in the E. Jean Carrol case, which is 83 million. That’s a lot money as well, but it’s not even a 5th of what he owes New York State.

So the bottomline here, is Donald Trump has 25 days to come with 450 million, perhaps 500 million by then, or he goes bankrupt, just as he’s trying to run for President again, just as he’s facing two felony convictions, in separate jurisdictions, by the end of this summer.”

From The New Democrat

To sum this up really quickly: Donald Trump is not only not a billionaire, but he’s a fraud. We’ve known (well, at least anyone whose not confined to the national mental institution known as MAGA) for at least 10 years that Donald Trump is a fraud:

Donald Trump’s own personal creation, his own personal piggy bank, also known as Trump University, was sued out of business right before he ran for President the 1st time back in 2015 (before this seemingly, never-ending, long national nightmare, known as Trumpism, invaded America)

and of course his own presidency and all the ridiculous, out in far-right field promises that he made to everyone, that he thought might vote for him, like the border wall, and claiming that Mexico would pay for it

the self-proclaimed King of Debt, claiming that he would pay off the national debt, before his presidency was over, etc.

But, thanks to New York Attorney General Letitia James, now America (except for the national mental institution, as well as idiots convention, known as MAGA) knows that Donald Trump is not only not a billionaire, but perhaps the world’s biggest fraud as well.

America simply can’t risk anyone like Donald Trump, ever getting to The White House even on a tour, let alone becoming President of the United States again. It’s the obligation of every true American patriot, who loves America, who loves American liberal democracy, to do everything that they can within the law, as well as being true to themselves and true to the country, to make sure that Donald Trump and his MAGA cult, never get any real power in America again.

Posted in Meidas Touch, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Lincoln Project: CPAC 2024 in 120 Seconds

The Lincoln Project_ CPAC 2024 in 120 SecondsSource:The Lincoln Project– U.S. Representative Elise Stefanik (Republican, New York) was one of the original Never-Trumpers, at least in the House, before she decided she want to be Vice President of the United States.

Source:The New Democrat

“The Lincoln Project is a leading pro-democracy organization in the United States — dedicated to the preservation, protection, and defense of democracy. Our fight against Trumpism is only beginning. We must combat these forces everywhere and at all times — our democracy depends on it.”

From The Lincoln Project

I already talked about what I think of CPAC (which actually stands for Crazy People At a Convention) last Friday. But here it is again, for anyone who wants to see it.

Former U.S. Representative Charlie Dent (Republican, Pennsylvania) talking to Brianna Keilar and John Berman on CNN:

“CPAC has always been an odd gathering. But now it’s been taken over by radicals, anti-vaxers. It’s a land of misfits, toys, it’s a political freaks show. It’s the Star Wars bar, it’s bizarre… Serious people are not showing up to this thing. They had their stupid straw poll, its rank choice now. They’re not serious and one doesn’t know if they should laugh or they should cry about what they’re watching and witnessing at these CPAC gatherings.”

I’m well aware that CPAC stands for: “Conservative Political Action Conference”, but come on, is this really a conservative event anymore?”

You can see the rest of this post on The New Democrat .

I guess another good way to describe Crazy People At A Convention, (also known as CPAC) is with a hypothetical:

Imagine if there were let’s say 100, maybe a 1,000 people, whoever showed up at CPAC last weekend, who not just got our prison, perhaps a mental hospital, but just got out of solitary confinement either in prison, or at a secure forensic hospital, (which is a prison for mentally ill criminals) and they’ve been institutionalized for a very longtime and perhaps were just released because of prison overcrowding.
So now these folks our out of the institution, they’ve been out of society for a very longtime, the world even in real life, doesn’t look the way it did lets’s say 20-30 years ago, before they were institutionalized.

So now you have all these career criminals and career mental patients, who decide to invade Washington, for let’s say their annual get together. That’s what CPAC looks like, at least in a political sense. You have a lot of people there who look and act like they’re from not even the 1950s, but perhaps even in the 1920s, and still think that’s what America is culturally, ethnically, racially, religiously. And they just get out of the institution and see this new country that’s also called America and feel the need to fight back and “take back America” and return America to the “real Americans” as they see themselves.

MAGA doesn’t live in the same country as everyone else. This is not the Conservative Political Action Conference. This is as one of the CPAC speakers said Jack Posobiec, this is a movement that wants to not end American democracy, but American liberal democracy and replace it with some type of Christian Nationalist government, where life for Americans who aren’t Northern European, who aren’t Protestant, who aren’t male, would very different from the way it is today.

To the outside world, MAGA looks like a bunch of escaped mental patients. The problem is, they’re big enough, they’re crazy enough, they’re violent enough, to take down the American form of government and all our individual rights, if the real American patriots don’t stand up, fight back, and prevent these folks from ever getting any real power in this country.

Posted in The Lincoln Project, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Jesse Dollemore: ‘Kenneth Chesebro LIED TO PROSECUTORS To Hide His Conspiracy With Donald Trump!!!’

Jesse Dollemore: Kenneth Chesebro LIED TO PROSECUTORS to Hide His Conspiracy with Donald Trump!!!Source:Jesse Dollemore talking about MAGA Georgia lawyer Kenneth Chesebro.

Source:The New Democrat

“Jesse talks about Kenneth Chesebro and his plea deal that is now possibly in jeopardy after it’s been revealed that he lied to investigators and prosecutors about his social media usage.”

From Jesse Dollemore

“As Mr. Popok mentioned, it’s not just the State of New York, or the U.S. Department of Justice, or Fulton County, Georgia, where Donald Trump is in current legal jeopardy, but the other states where he and his wannabe Keystone Cops crew tried to interfere in their 2020 presidential elections, simply to declare Donald Trump the winner, instead of Joe Biden, who democratically and legally won the 2020 presidential election, not Donald Trump.”

From The New Democrat

“Kenneth Chesebro is a co-defendant in the Fulton County, Georgia, election overturning case, that’s being prosecuted by District Attorney Fani Willis. But he’s a cooperating co-defendant, which means he pleaded guilty to a felon here in Georgia, in exchange for a lighter sentence, that probably keeps him out of prison.

But to stay out of prison, Ken Chesebro has to spill the beans, (to use an old cliche) he has to let the dogs out (to use a more modern phrase) and tell Fulton County DA everything that he knows about his involvement, in trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election and just automatically declare Donald J. Trump as the winner of the 2020 presidential election.”

From The New Democrat

I only mention a few paragraphs from my two previous posts about Kenneth Chesebro from 2023, because I know there are insomniacs who read The New Democrat and I want to help them get some sleep. No, seriously, I’m a recovering insomniac myself and I’m up late on a regular basis talking about The New Democrat with my fellow readers of this blog, so we can get some sleep. Actually, there’s another reason why I mentioned a few paragraphs from my previous posts about Ken Chesebro.

I’m going to give you a hypothetical. Imagine being caught shoplifting at a department store and instead of security there turning you into the police, they let you go, as long as you promise to never steal from that store again and put the stuff back that you tried to steal. So now you have a stay out of jail free card. So what do you do with that?

Well, if you are Mr. Chesebro or perhaps some kleptomaniac, you rip up your stay out of jail free card and go to the next store next door, perhaps thinking the security there is not as good and you can get way with it. But guess what, they have security as well to and catch you as you are walking out the door because the security alarm goes off. Or they’re simply not blind and just happened to notice one of the things that you were trying to steal, falling out of your jacket. And grab you right away.

That’s who Ken Chesebro is right now. The political kleptomaniac, who was caught redhanded trying to steal a presidential election. Who was not just given a stay out of jail card, by the Fulton County, Georgia District Attorney, but a chance to keep his law license as well. And what does he do with that stay out jail free card? I’ll give a big clue. He doesn’t say something like: “Geez, that was too close. If it wasn’t for those kind security officers, I might be eating a week’s old baloney sandwich, in a jail cell, for dinner tonight. I’ve learned my lesson about stealing.” Instead, he rips that card up and gets caught lying under oath about his past Twitter account, trying to hide his MAGA tweets about trying to overthrow the 2020 presidential election, in favor of then President Donald J. Trump.

So now it’s not just Mr. Chesebro’s law license that is at risk, but his personal freedom as well. Imagine the balls of this guy (to be frank) that he thinks he could openly perjure himself, thinking that the prosecutors and the police detectives on this case, would never bother to to track what he said under oath. Or that journalists who’ve been following this case on day one, like from CNN and other news organizations would just automatically take your word and never track what you said either.

Ken Chesebro must have thought he was main speaker at an idiots conventions, thinking they would believe he was Jesus Christ, if he told this audience that. Which is not that different from how the rest of MAGA thinks of Donald Trump.

Posted in Jesse Dollemore, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment