ABC News: Donald Trump Sentenced To Unconditional Discharge in New York Hush Money Case

Source:The New Democrat

“President-elect Donald Trump was sentenced Friday in his historic hush money case to an unconditional discharge — allowing Trump to avoid prison, fines or probation, but cementing his status as a convicted felon just 10 days before he takes the oath of office for his second term.

During a brief virtual hearing, New York prosecutors blasted him for engaging in a “direct attack on the rule of law” and making efforts to “undermine its legitimacy” by attacking the judge and others involved in the case. Trump’s defense team, which vowed to appeal, said the case should never have been brought and called it a “sad day for this country.”

Judge Juan Merchan, who was a frequent target of Trump during the trial, said the unconditional discharge was the “only lawful sentence” to protect “the office of the president … not the occupant of the office.”

ABC News_ Donald Trump Sentencing_ Judge Gives Donald Trump 'Unconditional Discharge' To RespectSource:ABC News– with a look at Donald J. Trump & his criminal lawyer Todd Blanche.

From ABC News

“President-elect Donald Trump sentenced in New York hush money case.”

ABC News_ LIVE_ President-Elect Donald Trump Sentenced in New York Hush Money CaseSource:ABC News with a look at Donald J. Trump: 45th President of the United States & 34 time convicted felon.

From ABC News

Me personally, I would’ve liked to have seen Judge Juan Merchan sentenced Donald J. Trump to have to pay a fine based on the hush money payments that he made to the two women in this conspiracy that he tried to get away with 8 years ago and perhaps plus interest. But Donald Trump’s convictions will be appealed, so even a fine wouldn’t go into effect for like another year.

Plus, Mr. Trump is going to be President of the United States in 10 days and when that happens, enforcing a fine against him, will be almost impossible because he would just say that he’s President of the United States and therefor doesn’t have to follow local laws and cooperate with local law enforcement.

So based on Mr. Trump’s immediate circumstances, this is as good as it gets for anyone who still believes in the rule of law in America. Especially for people who oppose Donald J. Trump. Mr. Trump is not only now a 34 time convicted felon because of all the evidence in this case and that the jury concluded that as well, but he’s also now a 34 time sentenced convicted felon. And will remain so probably the rest of his life. Because of all the evidence in the case, the fact that he was charged for crimes before he ever became POTUS, and was tried after he left the presidency the first time and not as President.

You can follow me on:

Threads

Blue Sky

Posted in ABC News, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Kasie Hunt: ‘Donald Trump Critic Geoff Duncan Reacts To Being Expelled From GOP’

Source:The New Democrat

“In an interview with CNN’s Kasie Hunt, former Georgia Lieutenant Governor Geoff Duncan reacts to being expelled from the GOP after the Executive Committee of the state’s Republican Party unanimously voted Duncan out.”

CNN_ Donald Trump Critic Geoff Duncan Reacts to Being Expelled From GOPSource:CNN interviewing former Lieutenant Governor of Georgia, Geoff Duncan.

From CNN

“He was once one of the most powerful Republicans in the state, an ally of both Gov. Brian Kemp and then-President Donald Trump. Now former Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan is a proud Never Trumper facing an extraordinary expulsion drive from the state GOP.

Duncan got notice of the Georgia GOP committee’s unprecedented vote to expel him Monday in an email that said he was barred from qualifying with the GOP if he seeks state office again and demanded that he quit referring to himself as a Republican.

The note from Justin Rice, the party’s executive director, also ominously informed Duncan he could face trespassing charges if he ever sets foot at a state GOP event again. It ended with a warning: “Be governed accordingly.”

For Duncan, who weathered accusations of betraying his party long before he endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris, it’s the most significant escalation yet by pro-Trump factions seething over his embrace of the Democrat during last year’s campaign.

It is not clear what legal standing the committee has over Duncan, should he choose to challenge the resolution, which also “hereby expunged” Duncan’s GOP nomination as the Republican candidate for lieutenant governor and two terms in the Georgia House.

He told “Politically Georgia” Tuesday he was unpacking the state Executive Committee’s unanimous resolution, which included spicy language calling Duncan unworthy of the title of even a “nominal” Republican.

But the former lieutenant governor said he wasn’t sure himself whether he wanted to be called a Republican anymore, at least in Georgia, adding he doesn’t want to be linked with the “embarrassment” of the state GOP.

Duncan said he’d rather be labeled a “good, old-fashioned American” right now.

“Both sides have got some good positive directions, both sides have got some negative directions. And being an honest umpire, sitting in the middle, is a pretty good spot.”

Of the timing of the state party’s decision, he added a pointed barb to party heavyweights.”

From the Atlanta Journal

It wasn’t the “GOP” that Geoff Duncan was expelled from. Unless “GOP” stands for: “Grand Old Parasites”. The Grand Old Party (with very few exceptions) doesn’t really exist anymore.

Not only does the Grand Ole Party no longer exist, but we really don’t have a conservative political party anymore. And I don’t say this fondly even as a Democrat, because I’m JFK Democrat (meaning a real Liberal Democrat) and America simply needs a political party in this country that says no and defeats bad public policy, even when it’s popular. But I would also like to see homelessness evaporated as well. But I’m not holding my breath on either.

Getting kicked out of the MAGA Party is not a bad thing. At least for anyone who shouldn’t be institutionalized right now, who is intelligent, loves America and all the different types of people who live here, and doesn’t want this country to be taken over by oligarchs and wannabe dictators. And the percentage of Americans who share those values, I agree gets smaller everyday. But they’re still around.

So Geoff Duncan has nothing to be ashamed of. He was kicked out of a political party that’s run by madmen now. And he has no business in that party and will be lot better off living in the real world, far away from that political nuthouse, that some people today still call the “Republican Party”.

You can follow me on:

Threads

Blue Sky

Posted in CNN, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

George Carlin On War

Source:The New Democrat

“Well, we like war!

We like war! We’re a war-like people! We like war because we’re good at it! You know why we’re good at it? Cause we get a lot of practice. This country’s only 200 years old and already, we’ve had 10 major wars. We average a major war every 20 years in this country so we’re good at it! And it’s a good thing we are; we’re not very good at anything else anymore! Huh? Can’t build a decent car, can’t make a TV set or a VCR worth a fuck, got no steel industry left, can’t educate our young people, can’t get health care to our old people, but we can bomb the shit out of your country all right! Huh? Especially if your country is full of brown people; oh we like that don’t we? That’s our hobby! That’s our new job in the world: bombing brown people.

Iraq, Panama, Grenada, Libya, you got some brown people in your country, tell them to watch the fuck out or we’ll goddamn bomb them! Well when’s the last white people you can remember that we bombed? Can you remember the last white— can you remember ANY white people we’ve ever bombed? The Germans, those are the only ones and that’s only because they were trying to cut in on our action. They wanted to dominate the world! BULLSHIT! THAT’S OUR FUCKING JOB! Now, we only bomb brown people – not because they’re trying to cut in on our action – just because they’re brown.

Now you probably noticed I don’t feel about that war the way we were told we were supposed to feel about that war, the way we were ordered and instructed by the United States government to feel about that war.

You see, I tell ya, my mind doesn’t work that way. I got this real moron thing I do; it’s called “thinking”, and I’m not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions. I don’t just roll over when I’m told to. Sad to say, most Americans just roll over <snap> on command, not me.

I have certain rules I live by; my first rule: I don’t believe anything the government tells me… nothing, zero, no, and I don’t take very seriously, the media or the press in this country, who in the case of the Persian Gulf war were nothing more than unpaid employees of the Department of Defence, and who most of the time, most of the time functioned as kind of an unofficial public relations agency for the United States government. So I don’t listen to them, I don’t really believe in my country and I gotta tell you folks, I don’t get all choked up about yellow ribbons and American flags. I consider them to be symbols and I leave symbols to the symbol-minded…

Medium_ Amazing Lessons George Carlin Can Teach CreatorsSource:Lingq

From Lingq

“We are a Warlike People”

Candid Skeptic_ George Carlin On WarSource:Candid Skeptic

From Candid Skeptic

The last few weeks I’ve been giving you lots of reasons why the far-left in America (Socialists, Communists, Hippies) don’t like George Carlin. And all of that really has to do with his beliefs in free speech, personal freedom, and individualism.

If George Carlin was performing and speaking today, he would be treated like Bill Maher by the far-left and he would probably have to hire an army of bodyguards to protect him. And he wouldn’t be allowed to perform on college campuses by the far-left, because of the way that Carlin made fun of radical feminists and the far-left in general. He probably probably would’ve gone after Islamism, especially militant Islamism as well, in America in general.

But you listen to George Carlin and how he talks about war and the far-left would talk about him, the way they paise Che Guevara or someone other militant leftist from the 1960s or 70s. I mean he would be like their God to them. (Even though most of these folks are Atheists) Because this is how the far-left sees the United States of America. We’re just 1, huge, war machine, in the business to protect “The Man” and to bomb the hell out of people who have dark complexions, especially if they have a lot of oil and gas as well.

And 1 other thing that the far-left loves about George Carlin: he cusses his ass off. He could barely get through a sentence with delivering a “fuck”, or a “shit”, or “fucking”, “mother fucker”, etc. And that’s how those folks talk to each other and how their militants talk to people they disagree with online. Which is only about almost everybody. They can get very pissed off online, perhaps because they’re so lonely and unhappy.

You can follow me on:

Threads

Blue Sky

Twitter

Posted in George Carlin, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Law & Order: McCoy VS Shalvoy

“I can sum up this excellent season finale of Law & Order “The Drowned and The Saved” in just a few words:

The Drowned: The Shalvoys
The Saved: Jack McCoy and the DA’s office

Unlike the Law & Order SVU finale “Zebras” ”The Drowned and The Saved” successfully closed out a chapter in this season by tying together a story arc that has been building all year. I never liked Governor Shalvoy (I still think that Tom Everett Scott was wrong for the role) and I was very glad when he got his just desserts. It was also very pleasing that he got it at the hands of Michael Cutter, who for once used his slight of hand and trickery very wisely. It was worth tolerating the Shalvoys all season just to see them both taken down in such a gratifying manner.

Most enjoyable was Jack McCoy’s (Sam Waterston’s) soliloquy in Shalvoy’s home where he passionately outlined the extent of corruption and expressing concerns about his good works. My only question about that scene was what would have prevented Jack from going into that meeting wearing a wire? Is it illegal to record on of your own conversations with someone else? I think not. I wondered – if Jack would have recorded Governor Shalvoy’s veiled attempt to buy him off, would the case against him or his wife have been a lot easier for the DA’s office to make? But I suppose one does not enter the governor’s home wearing a wire unless one has cause. Me, I would do it in a nanosecond!

The episode was also peppered with some enjoyable lines. I loved when Jack made the reference to the fact they were trying to indict the governor, not a ham sandwich. Everyone knows that Jack can indict a ham sandwich – provided it has meat in it.

The closing of the episode was presented in a way that if it had been the last show of the series, it would have made for a satisfying close. Lucky for us, we will have Law & Order for one more season. With Shalvoy out of the way and likely Joe Chappell’s attachment to the governor being tainted by his wife’s murder trial, we are left to think that Jack will win re-election. Let’s hope that is the case…

Source:All Things Law & Order – Left to right: Tom E. Scott, Alison Elliot, and Sam Waterson.

From All Things Law & Order

“Well, this is it for Law & Order “the mothership” for the season. We will have Criminal Intent coming up in June to look forward to.

The season finale episode information from NBC is below. We will get another dose of Tom Everett Scott in his role of Governor Shalvoy. Let’s hope he can pull the role off better in this episode than he did in “Personae Non Grata.” I can’t help but see him and immediately thinking of him in the movie “That Thing You Do” with his band called The Oneders – pronounced ONE-DERS (or wonders), not O-NEE-ders. If you’ve seen the movie, you get it.

Law and Order Excalibur Air Date May 21, 2008

A JEWELER IS FOUND MURDERED EXPOSING A PROSTITUTION RING.

Jeweler Victor Madison is found murdered, and Detectives Cyrus Lupo (Jeremy Sisto) and Kevin Bernard (Anthony Anderson) investigate a peculiar deposit made into Madison’s bank account. The deposit leads the detectives to investigate Madison’s brother-in-law, Frank Beezley, who was running an illegal prostitution ring, The Excalibur Club. Closing the case proves to be a challenge, as the trial gets risky for Jack McCoy (Sam Waterston) when his job is threatened. Also Starring: S. Epatha Merkerson, Linus Roache, and Alana De La Garza. Guest Star: Tom Everett Scott…

Source:All Things Law & Order – left to right: Alana De La Garza, Linus LaRouche, and Sam Waterson

From All Things Law & Order

“It’s rare that I find myself not even wanting to spend time recapping an episode, but this one is an exception. I found this episode tedious to watch and sometimes confusing, coupled with what I thought was a terrible case of stunt casting…

Source:All Things Law & Order

From All Things Law & Order

“While preparing a murder case, the DA’s office stumbles on a potential scandal involving a prostitution business and the governor of New York, and it could have serious implications on Jack McCoy’s future as District Attorney.”

Source:IMDB – Alison Elliot making a very memorable guest-appearance on Law & Order in 2008.

From IMDB

“A murder investigation uncovers connections to the governor’s wife, and perhaps a scandal involving the governor and an appointment for an open US Senate seat. But can Jack McCoy successfully prosecute and not risk his chances at being elected?”

Source:IMDB – Alison Elliot making a very memorable guest appearance on Law & Order in 2009.

From IMDB

So just to give you a little personal background about the 3 episodes of Law & Order, (that I call McCoy VS Shalvoy) first and that should give you a little idea why I’m writing about them and I’ll also tell you what I think about them.

I’m a Law & Order junkie. I got into this series during my senior of high school in the mid 1990s and watched almost every episode up until the early 2000s, before my work life changed. But then I become a blogger 15 years ago and this is what I’m doing, which is writing about what I see in life and what interests and impresses me.

So for the last 10 years or so, I’ve been watching a lot of Law & Order on cable, watching the reruns, recording a helluva lot episodes from my DVR to DVD. And the McCoy V Shalvoy storyline impresses me. I guess the producers liked it as well because they produce 2 episodes where Manhattan, New York District Attorney Jack McCoy (played by Sam Watersnon) literally tries to prosecute and put away the sitting Governor of New York, Donald Shalvoy (played by Thomas Everett Scott) for political corruption and other serious felonies.

So this is what this is about: Manhattan District Attorney Jack McCoy, who obviously has a big job, but he’s not even the DA for an entire city. Just the Borough of Manhattan, trying to take down the Governor of New York, which just happens to be the 4th largest state in the union. Which is my main problem with this storyline, which I’ll get into later.

So it’s not just the Governor of New York that the Manhattan DA wants to bring down. (I guess this guy is really greedy and has multiple sets of balls) But his beautiful, adorable wife, (played by Alison Elliot) who I believe is like the 2000s version of the femme fatale. Someone who is great to look at, but uses her physical appearance, her adorableness, as well as her intelligence, to protect her husband, as well as herself, and to advance her own career.

In the Drowned and The Saved episode (2009) the First Lady of New York State, Rita Shalvoy (played by Alison Elliot) hires a local, New Jersey security professional, to murder a man because he’s in her way from getting to run a major charitable foundation… you have to have a pretty big set, to even think of that. But that’s exactly what she does, even though she’s the First Lady of New York State, in the Drowned and The Saved episode.

The expression: “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely”, I think applies to the Shalvoys: (played by Tom E. Scott & Alison Elliot)

Obviously the New York Attorney General isn’t aware or doesn’t care about what the First Family is up to.

The Lieutenant Governor is apparently clueless.

And the Legislature doesn’t seem to aware of Shalvoy corruption either.

And the only reason why NYPD and the Manhattan DA is aware of what going on here with the Governor and his wife, is because 2 crimes that they’re investigating, the Shalvoy’s are involved in both of them.

So I think I’ve gotten into my problem with the storyline here. I mean a big city, borough DA, trying to bring down a sitting governor of his own state… I mean I could understand if he DA was going after the Borough President of Manhattan, perhaps even the Mayor of New York City. But the fact that a local, borough DA, who is not even responsible for an entire city, going after the governor of 1 of the biggest states in the union, I think is too much for him. I don’t think it’s believable either.

But other than that important fact, I think the Excalibur and the Drowned and the Saved episodes are really good and really interesting. I think Alison Elliot is the star of the Downed and the Saved episode and Tom Scott is the star of the Excalibur episode. She gets caught, but plays the femme fatale perfectly. And Governor Shalvoy is ja step ahead and plays his cards perfectly in the Excalibur episode.

Source:The New Democrat

You can follow me on:

Threads

Blue Sky

Twitter

Posted in Law & Order, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dallas: Season 3 – Rodeo (1979) Linda Gray Stars

Source:The New Democrat

“Dallas Episode Guide (Rodeo): It’s Ewing Rodeo Time! Sue Ellen flirts with handsome cowboy Dusty Farlow (Jared Martin) while Digger Barnes meets John Ross Ewing III. Ray Krebbs gets some welcome news.

Rodeo | S03E08 | Cool Channel Dallas Guide (Original Airdate: November 9, 1979)

Cool Channel reviews Rodeo from Dallas, Season 3, Episode 8. Directed by Leonard Katzman. Written by Camille Marchetta. Starring Barbara Bel Geddes as Miss Ellie, Jim Davis as Jock Ewing, Patrick Duffy as Bobby Ewing, Victoria Principal as Pamela Ewing, Larry Hagman as J.R. Ewing, Charlene Tilton as Lucy Ewing, Linda Gray as Sue Ellen Ewing, and Steve Kanaly as Ray Krebbs. Guest starring Jared Martin as Dusty Farlow.”

Cool Channel Network_ Rodeo_ Dallas GuideSource:Cool Channel Network– Jared Martin & Linda Gray. Perhaps you can tell for yourself who is who.

From the Cool Channel Network

Some information that I found on Google, that doesn’t seem to be attached to anyone. Sort of like people voting in private. Like in Congress.

“In the TV show Dallas, Sue Ellen Ewing married J.R. Ewing for more than just money, but she did have other motives:

Custody of her son
J.R. married Sue Ellen in an attempt to win back custody of their son and gain voting shares in the family oil company.

To remain married
Sue Ellen decided to remain married to J.R. in name only after catching him cheating on her.

To avoid a messy divorce
In one episode, J.R. threatened to have Sue Ellen taken to a hospital and divorced without receiving any money.

Sue Ellen and J.R.’s marriage was tumultuous, with J.R. frequently unfaithful and dismissive of Sue Ellen. They divorced in 1981, remarried in 1982, and divorced again in 1988.”

I agree with the narrator of this video to a certain extent. Of course Linda Gray looks absolutely incredible in this episode. Of course physically, I mean she’s Linda Gray. And when you think of Linda Gray, you should think of Jaclyn Smith, Raquel Welch, Jill St. John, Stephanie Powers, Lynda Carter, Catherine Bach, Pamela Grier, Jayne Kennedy, a few of the Hollywood goddesses of that era.

But my broader point here is that Sue Ellen Ewing (played by Linda Gray) looks so great on this episode, because she looks like she’s having a good time. She looks like she’s having a good day and she doesn’t look like she needs to pour an entire bottle of scotch or bourbon down her throat, perhaps hit a liquor joint and buy every bottle that they have and perhaps drink everything before she gets home, just to get through the day. She’s looks happy in this episode, except when her husband John Ross (played by Larry Hagman) is around.

I give you all of that information about the relationship, perhaps agreement, that Sue Ellen has with John Ross (that’s technically called a marriage) because in the Rodeo episode, Sue Ellen doesn’t look like she’s the Melania Trump of her generation, who marries a wealthy man, simply to have a kid, or multiple kids, knowing that she would never have to work for a living to support herself or her kids. Despite all the garbage that her husband throws at her, with the upfront verbal disrespect, as well as all the adultery.

In the Rodeo episode, Sue Ellen looks like she’s having a good day at the ranch, enjoying the rodeo, enjoying the company of the people there. (Except of course her husband) And since this is an episode about a rodeo, and this is Dallas, Texas, and Linda Gray is Linda Gray with that gorgeous, adorable face, and the beautiful long body, the TV world got to see her in those beautiful designer denim jeans, in boots, with the white blouse and leather vest.

You can follow me on:

Threads

Blue Sky

Twitter

Posted in Action, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

President Richard Nixon: The War On Poverty

Source:The New Democrat

“The arguments that framed President Richard Nixon’s Family Assistance Plan have wielded tremendous influence over US antipoverty and family policy debates, setting the stage for five decades of policy development that have led us back to a “guaranteed income” through the temporary expansion of the child tax credit in 2021.

Today, the US faces a safety-net design that policymakers have always intentionally avoided: a form of guaranteed income that discourages work plus a large, bureaucratic welfare state.

Amid this backdrop, federal policymakers have an opportunity to refocus efforts toward creating a coordinated safety net that meets the challenges poor Americans face today and helps them improve their families’ prospects for tomorrow by connecting more families to work.

In 1969, President Richard Nixon released the Family Assistance Plan (FAP), proposing to replace the country’s largest welfare program at the time—Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)—with a guaranteed minimum income for all families with children. In proposing the plan, President Nixon cited a widespread failure of the US safety net to meaningfully combat poverty in America. In Nixon’s words, “Whether measured by the anguish of the poor themselves, or by the drastically mounting burden on the taxpayer, the present welfare system has to be judged a colossal failure..

American Enterprise Institute: Angela Rachidi: America’s Path Toward a Guaranteed Income for Families with Children_ How Nixon’s Family Assistance Plan Shaped Antipoverty PolicySource:American Enterprise Institute Senior Fellow Angela Rachidi. 

From the American Enterprise Institute

President Richard Nixon: “The War On Poverty has been first in promises, first in politics, first in press releases, and last in performance”.

From the Richard Nixon Foundation

Whether or not President Nixon actually made that statement about the “War On Poverty”, or not, I don’t know. The Richard Nixon Foundation is pretty partisan and extremely loyal to Richard Nixon. But whether the President said that or not, it’s a very clever line. And I can’t say I disagree with it. But only because I don’t.

What I’m about to tell you is going to sound as unbelievable as hearing about hurricanes in Las Vegas, or Seattle running out of water and coffee on the same day, Wisconsin getting no snow in January, etc… But Richard Milhous Nixon was a Progressive Republican. At least on economic policy, and even civil rights, and to a certain extent social policy, (which I’m about to get in to) and even foreign policy and national security.

And I know that hearing that Richard Nixon was a Progressive Republican, is like hearing Socialists who are Libertarians or vice-versa, or fish who hate water and are dying to get on land, or something like that, but Richard Nixon came from the Theodore Roosevelt, Thomas Dewey, Dwight Eisenhower, Nelson Rockefeller wing of the Republican Party. Or the Liberal Democrats from the 1950s and 60s, who became Republicans in the 1970s because they thought the Democratic Party was moving too far to the Left, who are called Neoconservatives today.

And to get back to the line about Richard Nixon and the War On Poverty: he didn’t run for President and more importantly he wouldn’t have gotten elected President of the United States, to dismantle the New Deal and Great Society. He wouldn’t have gotten elected had he run on that. When he became President of 1969, he had a Democratic Congress with only 195 or so Republicans in the House and about 43 Republicans in the Senate. So he wouldn’t have been able to dismantle the New Deal and Great Society anyway. And had he tried to that as President, it not only wouldn’t have worked, but it probably would’ve cost him reelection in 1972.

But what President Nixon did instead was propose an alternative to the New Deal and Great Society:

President Nixon’s approach was based on work, independence, and federalism. That the states should run these social programs, instead of the Feds, and that they should be designed to move people out of poverty and into the workforce as middle class Americans, through things like work, education, and opportunity. And that idea basically became what President Bill Clinton and a Republican Congress passed in 1996, which is known as Welfare To Work.

You can follow me on: 

Threads

Blue Sky

Twitter

Posted in Richard Nixon Presidency, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jimmy Carter The President

The Movie Gourmet: JIMMY CARTER – “What People Say They Want - Hendrik HertzbergSource:The Movie Gourmet with a look at the American Experience documentary about Jimmy Carter.

Source:The New Democrat

“In PBS’ American Experience documentary Jimmy Carter, The New Yorker writer and former Carter speechwriter Henrik Hertzberg says:

Jimmy Carter was what the American people always SAY they want – above politics, determined to do the right thing regardless of political consequences, a simple person who doesn’t lie, a modest man, not someone with a lot of imperial pretenses. That’s what people say they want. And that’s what they got with Jimmy Carter.”

From The Movie Gourmet

“Jimmy Carter’s story is one of the greatest dramas in American politics. In 1980, he was overwhelmingly voted out of office in a humiliating defeat. But over the subsequent two decades, he became one of the most admired statesmen and humanitarians in America and the world.

Through interviews with the people who knew him best, JIMMY CARTER traces his rapid ascent in politics, dramatic fall from grace and unexpected resurrection, including Carter family home movies and a rare film sequence of Carter’s final hours in the Oval Office, when he and his advisors waited in vain for the release of the Americans who had been held hostage in Tehran for 444 days.”

American Experience_ Jimmy CarterSource:American Experience Jimmy Carter.

From American Experience

When I saw this American Experience documentary about Jimmy Carter back in the spring or summer of 2003 on PBS, for the first time, this Hendrik Hertzberg (who was President Carter’s speechwriter from 1979-81) quote about Jimmy Carter, stuck with me. Perhaps the only memorable quote from the documentary from the people they interviewed. Other than what Vice President Walter Mondale said about high interest rates and inflation, high energy costs, the lack of available oil and gas in the economy, was bringing real pain to the America people. That they weren’t imagining that.

When a political candidate, especially a politician, tells the voters exactly what he plans to do as President of the United States and then you vote for him, he gets elected and 2-3 years later you don’t like what he’s doing, it’s not working out as well as you had hoped, don’t the voters have at least some responsibility in that? It’s not like they can honestly say:

“Well, we didn’t know that President Carter wanted us to conserve to help bring down prices and the cost of living, and was trying to balance the budget to reduce inflation and interest rates”.

You might not like what Jimmy Carter ran on when he ran for President in 1976. But that’s why we have a democracy so people can vote for the candidate they like, or at least prefer.

It’s one thing to be lied to and to be misled and just be sold a pile of junk at full price, not knowing what you were buying, because it look so beautiful when you bought it. But when the voters know what they’re getting ahead of time as far as what the candidate said he would do, if elected, and then he tries to do exactly that and even has some success at getting done what he said he would do, once he’s in office, the voters bare a lot of the responsibility there.

It’s as the great political satirist George Carlin said about American voters and politicians, that was featured on The New Democrat 3 weeks ago:

“Everybody complains about politicians. Everybody says they suck. Well, where do people think these politicians come from? They don’t fall out of the sky. They don’t pass through a membrane from some other reality.

They come from American parents, American families, American homes, American schools, American churches, American businesses, American universities, and they’re elected by American citizens.

This is the best we can do, folks. This is what we have to offer. It’s what our system produces. Garbage in…garbage out.

If you have selfish, ignorant citizens…if you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you’re gunna get selfish, ignorant leaders. And term limits ain’t gunna do ya any good. You’re just gunna wind up with a brand new bunch of selfish, ignorant Americans [leaders].

So, maybe…maybe…maybe it’s not the politicians who suck. Maybe something else sucks around here. Like…the public. Yeah, the public sucks! That’s a nice campaign slogan for somebody: “The public sucks! Fuck hope! Fuck hope!”

Because if it is really just the fault of the politicians then where are all the other bright people of conscience? Where are all the bright, honest, intelligent Americans ready to step in and save the nation and lead the way?”

You can see the rest of George Carlin’s standup about American politicians and voters on The New Democrat

This post is not about Jimmy Carter the President as far as how successful he was as President, or just as a politician when he was President. But more about the character of Jimmy Carter as President.

To paraphrase Hendrik Hertzberg: American voters during every election cycle (perhaps not so much now, but definitely pre-social media) say they want the President to be honest, to be above politics, to put the country above their own political ambitions and political party. But then they tend to vote for the person who is really just trying to get elected, or reelected, and is more than willing to say and do things, just to try to get reelected and get past the current political moment that they’re in.

American voters tend to say that they want a saint. But they vote for used car salesman instead, who advertise Ford Escorts as being better cars than Cadillacs. Not saying that James E. Carter (also known as Jimmy Carter) was a saint. But he was about as honest and decent of a man, perhaps the most honest and decent man who was ever President of the United States. And he never got rewarded, or even got any credit for that. Even though that’s what American voters tend to say that’s what they want as President of the United States.

You can follow me on:

Threads

Blue Sky

Posted in JEC Presidency, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

George Carlin On Abortion: Back in Town (1996)

Source:The New Democrat

“Stand-up comedian George Carlin is irreverent and on-point as he looks for consistency in the conservative argument against abortion.

“Back in Town” aired as a live broadcast from New York City’s Beacon Theater and features Carlin’s trademark acerbic observations on topics such as abortion, capital punishment, familiar expressions and bodily functions. Classic routines “Sanctity of Life,” “State Prison Farms,” “Free-Floating Hostility” and more are included in this hysterical stand-up comedy performance.”

Official George Carlin_ Abortion - Back In Town (1996)Source:Official George Carlin with his Back In Town 1996 performance.

From Official George Carlin

George Carlin: “If you’re pre-born, you’re fine, if you’re pre-schooled, you’re fucked. Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. Pro-life, these people aren’t pro-life, they’re killing doctors, what kind of pro-life is that? What, they’ll do everything they can do save a fetus, but if it grows up to be a doctor they just might have to kill it?”

From IMDB

George Carlin: “Boy these Conservatives are really something, aren’t they… They’re all in favor of the unborn. They’ll do anything for the unborn. But once you are born, you are on your own.”

You don’t need me to point that out to you. You can just watch the video. But I’m highlighting that point because I think it’s important.

I think writing satire about abortion, is like joking about about rape: “Hey, at least he was good looking. What are you complaining about? It might be the last time you ever have any chance of getting laid for a while anyway. Especially since you are in prison.” Something about joking around about abortion or rape, seems off to me. Maybe that’s just my conscience talking or something.

So I’m not going to be joking around about abortion. But people who call themselves the “Christian Right” (even though most of them probably can’t find a prayer in the Bible, let alone read the book before) that’s a different story. They’re a very easy target because a lot of them are so stupid and crazy, and represent a major political faction in America.

Let’s just start off with pro-life: if people who claim to be pro-life (who are really just antiabortion) ever had any real power in America, an escaped mental patient, as well as escaped convict, would have easier access to getting a gun legally, then a woman who needs a certain health procedure (like an abortion) just to stay alive. Or at least stay healthy.

If the far-right in America was ever in complete charge, not just The White House and Congress, but like all 50 states as well, all the courts, killing abortion doctors simply because they are abortion doctors, would be legal. But law enforcement officers who break up violent far-right political rallies, or arrest violent, far-right rioters, who are tying to break up the certifications of democratic elections, would be held legally liable for doing their duty and could go to prison.

Just because you are against abortion, doesn’t make you pro-life by itself. There are people who are antiabortion, as well as pro-life. But that’s because they believe in defense of all innocent lives. Not just fetuses who aren’t even people yet and therefor don’t have the same constitutional rights as people. But all innocent lives, regardless of their political affiliations, what they do for a living, their race, ethnicity, etc, or where they live.

I think what George Carlin was really doing here, is making fun of the people who in the 1990s were called the Christian-Right. People who as far as I”m concern, at least, don’t know anything about being a Conservative, or even a Christian, let alone being pro-life.

What the far-right in America actually are, at least mentally and culturally (if not in actuality) are people from the 1800s or early 1910s, who woke up 1 morning and discovered that this no longer looks like the America that they’re used to living in. And want to take the country back to that time where they’re more comfortable living in and force that lifestyle on everyone else, including through government force.

You can follow me on:

Threads

Blue Sky

Twitter

Posted in George Carlin, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

CNN: Where Have You Gone?

cnn viewership decline_ As viewership plummets, anxieties grow at CNN; staff worry what's next - The Economic TimesSource:The Economic Times– headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia.

Source:The New Democrat

If you are a Gen-Xer like me (meaning someone who was born in the 1960s or 70s) or even older than that, CNN was the first 24 HR cable news network (no pun intended) that you were aware of. Being almost 48 now, I’m old enough to remember when CNN was literally almost 24 hours of news.

CNN had a late sports news cast, called Sports Tonight, that sort of competed with ESPN SportsCenter, and they had Larry King Live who interviewed a lot of entertainment celebrities in the 1980s and 90, and they had Showbiz This Week, which obviously covered Hollywood and the broader entertainment industry during the 1990s. But back in the 1980s and 90s, CNN was literally the Cable News Network and it wasn’t just called that.

If you remember the 1990s and are were watching CNN back then, you remember hearing James Earl Jones narrating CNN’s trademark slogan: “This is CNN”. And that meant something back then. They were seen as basically the 60 Minutes, or the broadcast network nightly newscasts, of news. In some cases they were probably better than those shows, because they had more time to fill and more resources to use just covering current affairs and real news.

Now, the CNN slogan could easily be something like: “CNN: we offend the least”, because they are worried about hitting someone or something too hard, because they’re worried about losing viewers, regardless of what their facts and information from their reporters is reporting about the situation or individuals that are involved in the story. As if what they’re doing now (whatever it is) is not costing them viewers.

I think part of the problem of why CNN is not really 24 hours of hard news anymore, but most of their coverage now is just a lot of panel discussions and interviews with partisan figures, is that Americans simply don’t have the same level of interest in hard news coverage as they did even in the 1990s, with cable TV becoming so dominant and then the internet as well, and all the online publications, social media in the 2000s, 2010s, and today.

Americans today simply don’t have the same level of interest in hard news that Americans had in the 1960s and 70s before cable TV became a major player, when the broadcast network news divisions, and print media still dominated news coverage in America.

Americans by-en-large today, want their news either from social media, their favorite partisan publications. And when they do want TV news, they go to their favorite partisan networks like Fox News Channel, or MSNBC. But people are now leaving MSNBC perhaps as fast as CNN today. Making FNC the only source for cable news (if you want to call FNC news) as far as a place that gets any real ratings anymore.

So the change in how Americans get their news today and really the last 20 years, has really affected CNN in a bad way and they yet to find a way to be able to successfully adapt to that. In the early 2010s, they tried making reality TV and celebrity court trials a big part of their daily TV coverage. A lot of people still remember the George Zimmerman trial in 2013, when CNN covered it gavel-to-gavel. And that got their ratings up a bit during that trial. Which is a long way away from James E. Jones famous line, with that perfect delivery that he had which was: “This is CNN”. Which meant this is where you go for real news.

I don’t think CNN knows who they are and what they’re about anymore. Of course they’ll say they’re a a 24 hours news network dedicated to bringing Americans and their international audiences the best in cable news coverage, if not news coverage from any source. But this is no longer the CNN of Prime News, World News, Inside Politics, CNN This Morning. Or even Crossfire, Evans and Novak, The Capital Gang, shows that tried to intelligently debate American politics and current affairs. CNN now is just trying to tread water and in complete survival mode, not sure where they go from here and how they stay in the news business all together.

From The Economic Times:

“It has been noticed for a pretty long time now that the viewership of CNN is plummeting vigorously with every passing year. In a recent development Senator Dick Durbin was noticed to talk about the extreme low viewership of CNN and thus anxiety and worries inside the CNN still continues to grow.

According to The Washington Post, CNN has experienced a dramatic 45% drop in prime time viewership since the month of November specifically following the November 5 US Presidential election while averaging only 394,000 viewers which actually marked its worst performance in key demographics.

This current trend eventually reflects a broader decline in the television viewership as audiences shift towards streaming services and social media platforms. At the same time, MSNBC has similarly lost huge amount of viewers with its audience down pretty significantly post US Presidential election, asserted The Washington Post.

In spite of these ongoing challenges, CNN now claims to be the fourth most watched cable network overall with a digital strategy which is aimed at increasing the online subscriptions. The network also launched a paywall in the month of October at $3.99 per month but has not disclosed the subscriber numbers, noted The Washington Post.

Eminent critics within the CNN suggest that recent programming choices which include a town hall with US President- elect Donald Trump might have actually al ..

CNN has experienced a dramatic 45% drop in prime time viewership since the month of November specifically following the November 5 US Presidential election while averaging only 394,000 viewers which actually marked its worst performance in key demographics.”

From The Economic Times

You can follow me on:

Threads

Blue Sky

Posted in CNN, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Police Woman: Tigress (1978) Laraine Stephens Guest Stars

“POLICEWOMAN – Series 4 – Episode 11 – “Tigress”
Originally broadcast 11th January 1978

MOPPY-KUN TV now screens on both Dailymotion & you tube – episodes not here are definitely on Dailymotion.

Angie Dickinson as POLICE WOMAN was the first American Police Drama to feature a woman in the title role inspiring many women to join the force. POLICE WOMAN ran on NBCTV for four seasons from 13th September 1974 to 29th March 1978 consisting of 91 episodes.
Story synopsis: – A special team of undercover Police Officers work for the Criminal Conspiracy Unit at the Los Angeles Police Department.”

Source:MOPPY-KUN TV with a look at Laraine Stephens and Angie Dickinson on Police Woman.

From MOPPY-KUN TV

“Pepper resents her assignment to protect an unscrupulous former classmate who is now a political candidate.”

police woman_ tigress (1977) - Google SearchSource:IMDB– Laraine Stephens as Amelia Boyer

From IMDB

“At a public hearing in Dade County, Florida, parents were enraged. The nation, they said, was in peril and children were at risk. A recent ordinance had granted gay people housing and employment protections, and that meant teachers couldn’t be fired because of their sexuality. Florida classrooms quickly became a battleground, and opponents of the ordinance said the state’s support of civil rights for homosexuals was infringing on their rights as parents.

Action had to be taken, and a campaign to limit the legal rights of LGBTQ people — all in the name of protecting children — was enacted. A woman who spoke at this hearing said it was her right to control “the moral atmosphere in which my children grow up.” That woman was Anita Bryant, formerly Miss Oklahoma and a white, telegenic, Top 40 singer who was well known for her Florida orange juice commercials (“A day without orange juice is like a day without sunshine!” she’d say). Bryant spearheaded an anti-LGBTQ campaign of such impact that its echoes can be heard in today’s rhetoric. The year was 1977.

Last month, nearly half a century after Bryant’s “Save Our Children” campaign, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the Parental Rights in Education bill, dubbed the “Don’t Say Gay” bill by its opponents. The measure, which takes effect July 1, prohibits classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity in “kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.” Similar bills are being considered in 19 other states, according to the Movement Advancement Project, an LGBTQ think tank that has been tracking the bills…

“In the present environment, you can’t go after homosexual teachers anymore,” Faderman said. “We have too many allies. And so Florida has found another way to do it by this ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill, which doesn’t go after homosexual teachers precisely. But the idea is the same. That is, that homosexuality is a pariah status, and it shouldn’t be discussed in the public schools.”

Source:NBC News with a look at far-right active Anita Bryant in 1977,

From NBC News

“She came to national attention when millions of copies of her self-published book A Choice Not an Echo were distributed in support of Barry Goldwater’s 1964 presidential campaign, especially in California’s hotly fought winner-take-all-delegates GOP primary.[23] In it, Schlafly denounced the Rockefeller Republicans in the Northeast, accusing them of corruption and globalism. Critics called the book a conspiracy theory about “secret kingmakers” controlling the Republican Party.[24] Schlafly had previously been a member of the John Birch Society; founder Robert Welch Jr. referred to her as a “very loyal” member.[25] She later quit and denied she had been a member because she feared her association with the organization would damage her book’s reputation. By mutual agreement her books were not mentioned in the John Birch Society’s magazine, and the distribution of her books by the society was handled so as to mask their involvement. The society was able to dispense 300,000 copies of A Choice Not an Echo in California prior to the June 2, 1964, GOP primary.[26] Gardiner Johnson, Republican National Committee for California, stated that the distribution of her book in California was a major factor in Goldwater’s winning the nomination.

American feminists made their greatest bid for national attention at the 1977 National Women’s Conference in Houston; however, historian Marjorie J. Spruill argues that the anti-feminists led by Schlafly organized a highly successful counter-conference, the Pro-Life, Pro-Family Rally, to protest the National Women’s Conference and make it clear that feminists did not speak for them. At their rally at the Astro Arena they had an overflow of over 15,000 people,[30] and announced the beginning of a pro-family movement to oppose politicians who had been supporting feminism and liberalism, and to promote “family values” in American politics, and so moved the Republican Party to the right and defeated the ratification of the ERA.

Schlafly became an outspoken opponent of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) during the 1970s as the organizer of the “STOP ERA” campaign. STOP was a backronym for “Stop Taking Our Privileges”. She argued that the ERA would take away gender-specific privileges enjoyed by women, including “dependent wife” benefits under Social Security, separate restrooms for males and females, and exemption from Selective Service (the military draft).[32][33] She was opposed by groups such as the National Organization for Women (NOW) and the ERAmerica coalition. The Homemakers’ Equal Rights Association was formed to counter Schlafly’s campaign…

In 1972, when Schlafly began her campaign against the Equal Rights Amendment, the ERA had already been ratified by 28 of the required 38 states.[35] Seven more states ratified the amendment after Schlafly began organizing opposition, but another five states rescinded their ratifications. The last state to ratify the ERA was Indiana, where State Senator Wayne Townsend cast the tie-breaking vote in January 1977.[36] (Nevada, Illinois and Virginia ratified the ERA between 2017 and 2020, many years after the deadline to do so.)[37]

The Equal Rights Amendment was narrowly defeated, having only achieved ratification in a total 35 states.[7] Political scientist Jane J. Mansbridge concluded in her history of the ERA:
Many people who followed the struggle over the ERA believed—rightly in my view—that the Amendment would have been ratified by 1975 or 1976 had it not been for Phyllis Schlafly’s early and effective effort to organize potential opponents.[38]

Joan Williams argues, “ERA was defeated when Schlafly turned it into a war among women over gender roles.”[39] Historian Judith Glazer-Raymo argues:
As moderates, we thought we represented the forces of reason and goodwill but failed to take seriously the power of the family values argument and the single-mindedness of Schlafly and her followers. The ERA’s defeat seriously damaged the women’s movement, destroying its momentum and its potential to foment social change … Eventually, this resulted in feminist dissatisfaction with the Republican Party, giving the Democrats a new source of strength that when combined with overwhelming minority support, helped elect Bill Clinton to the presidency in 1992 and again in 1996.[40]

Critics of Schlafly pointed out that she was not a typical housewife, as she was heavily involved in political causes.”

Source:Wikipedia with a look at far-right activist Phyllis Schlafly.

From Wikipedia

I give you all this background information about Anita Bryant and Phyllis Schlafly because I wanted to see how many people I could get to run to the nearest and highest bridge to jump off from, to escape from having to do all this reading. Actually, I have another reason for this. Even better than the first 1.

With all this background info of Anita Bryant and Phyllis Schlafly, I’m trying to give you an idea of what American political culture was like in the mid and late 1970s on the Right. And I’m sure as hell not talking about the center-right.

And of course I’m not a mindreader. I’m also not a brain surgeon, or astronaut, or a murder 1 defense lawyer specializing in death penalty cases. (Just in case the jury is still out on any of that) I’m just saying that I believe that’s what this Police Woman episode is based on. At least the political background of the of Amelia Boyer, (played by Laraine Stephens) the woman that the fictional Criminal Conspiracy Unit in LAPD is assigned to protect in this episode.

If you are familiar with the Ann Coulter’s, the Mercedes Schlapp’s, Marjorie T. Greene’s and Lauren Boebert’s in the U.S. House of Representatives, these women from today… that’s who the Amelia Boyer (played by Laraine Stephens) character is like ideologically and culturally.

These far-right, female culture warriors, argue that America is essentially being taken over by independent, educated, Caucasian women, and at least to a certain extent racial and ethnic minorities. And that homosexuality and personal freedom in general, is “poisoning and blood of America” and that it’s time for the “real Americans” (meaning Anglo-Saxon-Protestants) to step up, fight back, and “take back America”.

And that’s who Anita Bryant was when it came to homosexuality and perhaps other culture war issues in Miami and San Francisco in the late 1970s. And that’s who Phyllis Schlafly was when it came to all these cultural war battles on the far-right in America, for really the 2nd half of her adult life starting in the mid 1960s and up until she died in 2016.

I saw the Tigress episode last night, knowing that I would be writing about it today. And I believe Laraine Stephens plays that Phyllis Schlafly like character beautifully (in more ways than 1) and perfectly. And LAPD Detective Sergeant Pepper Anderson (played by Angie Dickinson) plays the independent woman, who hates Amelia Boyer’s (played Laraine Stephens) politics and who represents the contrarian point of view to Miss Boyer’s politics, beautifully (in more ways than 1) and plays that role perfectly as well.

Source:The New Democrat 

You can follow me on:

Threads

Blue Sky

Twitter

Posted in Classic Movies, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment