Chris Cillizza: Is This The End For Pete Hegseth?

“Pete Hegseth, who [checks Truth Social] is still the Secretary of Defense, woke up to some brutal headlines today.

In the wake of the revelation that he had gone around Pentagon protocols and had Signal installed on an office computer and the news that his chief of staff was resigning to become a part-time government employee, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal dropped stories that suggest the end may be near for Hegseth.

Here’s the Journal headline: “Polygraph Threats, Leaks and Infighting: The Chaos Inside Hegseth’s Pentagon.”

The piece details how Hegseth, enraged by the leak that he was planning to give Elon Musk a briefing on war plans related to China, threatened several top Pentagon officials with a polygraph test to prove they had not done the leaking.

“I’ll hook you up to a f**king polygraph,” Hegseth allegedly told then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Chris Grady.

Not a great look!

The Post story paints a similar — and unflattering — portrait of Hegseth. This paragraph, in particular, is rough:

Defense officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity to be candid about the situation, have described Hegseth, 44, as paranoid and increasingly isolated. He is surrounded by only a small team of people whom he trusts and has become keenly focused on daily news coverage dissecting his missteps and decision-making.

Having been reporting on and observing politics for the last two-plus decades, I can tell you that this is how it looks near the end. An embattled political figure, driven to the point of distraction by all of the negative media coverage about him, bunkers in with only the people who tell him what he wants to hear.

That story very rarely ends well — for the person in Hegseth’s shoes that is.

Now, this is a whole new political world. Hegseth has been utterly defiant — publicly — in the face of the spate of negative stories. And Donald Trump likes fighters — people who don’t just wilt when the media horde comes for them.

So, maybe Hegseth survives! But man does it look bad for him at the moment…

Source:Chris Cillizza with a look at the Pete Hegseth story.

From Chris Cillizza

“Pete Hegseth is under increasing scrutiny as reports of dysfunction and controversy within the Pentagon mount. He reportedly bypassed security protocols to install the Signal messaging app on a government desktop and has become increasingly isolated, relying on a small circle of trusted allies. Two major reports—from The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal—describe him as paranoid, obsessed with media coverage, and quick to accuse staff of leaks, even threatening polygraph tests. Several top aides have resigned, including his chief of staff. Critics argue that Hegseth is focused more on his image than on his responsibilities, and while Donald Trump appreciates loyalty, his patience may be tested. The video suggests this could be the beginning of the end for Hegseth’s tenure.”

From Chris Cillizza

From The New Democrat earlier about Pete Hegseth:

“If you privately polled the Senate Republican Conference, or slipped some truth serum in their favorite coffee or favorite alcohol beverage, (according to Senator Mullin) or they were under oath, they would privately tell you that Pete Hegseth has no business serving as a Defense Department intern, let alone as Secretary of Defense. That he’s better qualified attending Alcoholic Anonymous meetings, and attending anger management meetings, then being responsible for America’s national security. But President Trump wants Hegseth, so that’s who he gets, according to a sold majority of the Senate Republican Conference. That’s my guess…

From The New Democrat

And from The New Democrat on Tuesday about Pete Hegseth:

“And to respond to a point that Jane Harman made on CNN: Donald Trump only fires his loyal staffers and cabinet members, when they become a problem for him personally. The President firing people has nothing to what with what’s in the best interest of the country, because he doesn’t care about that. (To be real)

And as former Representative Harman said, Pete Hegseth is now embarrassing The White House and the President because he was Donald Trump’s original choice for Secretary of Defense. But it’s now quite obvious that the Secretary of Defense can’t even be trusted with classified information. And it’s becoming harder for Congressional Republicans (House & Senate) to defend him against anything that comes up against him, especially if they’re in for tough reelection battles in 2026.”

From The New Democrat

would respond this way:

If Pete Hegseth cared about Donald J. Trump… I mean, actually cared about him, at least wanted him to do well politically and is not just at The Pentagon right now because he thinks it’s great for his career in the MAGA movement, I think he resigns a month ago. I mean sharing classified information on a chat app… why not just Tweet that information instead? If that’s not a fireable offense for a national security official, what is? And now it’s happened again, a month later. And he could’ve easily saved face on that and said something like:

“The Un-Americans in the media are out to try to destroy our great leader and I’ve become too much of a distraction in our great cause to save America from the Un-Americans and therefor I’ll resign as Secretary of Defense.” That could’ve been his resignation letter to President Trump and the President probably accepts that.

I think that’s what Secretary Hegseth’s resignation letter to President Trump would look like, if he actually cared about the President and simply wasn’t trying to hang on, because he thinks stepping down would be bad for his career or something.

Yes, I’m sure MAGA voters, just everyday Americans who don’t make they’re living in and out of politics, probably do love Donald J. Trump. But his associates, his career allies, his MAGA soldiers… Donald Trump is just a launching pad for their business and political careers. The more they’re loyal to him and the more they claim to love him, (even though to them in private, he’s a big loser, who actually knows very little, if anything about government policy) the better these Trump associates do for themselves.

If Pete Hegseth leaves The Pentagon, it won’t be voluntarily. The White House Chief of Staff or Vice President Vance will tell him that he can either resign or be fired, because he’s become too big of a distraction and the Defense Department can’t work with him anymore because of how much of a security risk and leak that he really is. But I don’t see Secretary Hegseth resigning for the reasons I just gave. That’s my theory.

Source:The New Democrat

You can follow me on Threads.

Posted in Chris Cillizza, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Kasie Hunt: Donald Trump Writes ‘Vladimir, STOP!’ After Russia Launches Deadliest Strikes On Kyiv Since Last Summer

“US President Donald Trump said he is “not happy” after Russia launched its deadliest wave of attacks on Kyiv in nine months, telling President Vladimir Putin to “STOP!” as he attempts to push Ukraine to agree on a contentious ceasefire proposal. Moscow sent 70 missiles and 145 drones toward Ukraine, mainly targeting Kyiv, in an attack that leader Volodymyr Zelensky said was aimed at pressuring the United States.”

Source:CNN with a look at the wannabe dictator & a real-life dictator. See if you can tell for yourself who is who.

From CNN

From the President of the United States:

“I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Lets get the Peace Deal DONE!”

From Donald J. Trump

So this is my reaction to Donald Trump’s “Truth” about Vladimir Putin and Russia:

Imagine witnessing a guy beating up another guy in the street, or just outside some store, on a sidewalk, or something like that and you are only person around who is actually witnessing this and your response to something like:

“Hey! Stop doing that. You are hurting him. That’s unfair. You want to get in trouble? I’ll tell on you!” Even though you are physically strong enough to at least get the bully off his victim and stop the immediate assault… or at the very least, yell for help, call 911, etc. You would look like the high school geek, who can’t even stand up for yourself, let alone someone else.

If Donald Trump had a conscience and any sense of shame, he wouldn’t have been embarrassed about his “Truth” about Russia’s bombing on Kyiv, because Russia wouldn’t even gotten the opportunity to do this.

Vladimir Putin is no more scared of Donald Trump, than the kitty is scared of the mouse. Vlad has no more respect for Don, than the rebellious high school class, has for the 85 year old substitute teacher, who walks around with a cane, who is going to be there for a week.

Source:The New Democrat

You can follow me on Threads.

Posted in CNN, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ben Meiselas: WOW! Fox News GIVES UP On Donald Trump in SHOCKING TWIST

“MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Fox News surprisingly turning against Trump on some of their programming during the day.”

Source:Meidas Touch with a look at FNC anchor Brett Baier and President Donald J. Trump (MAGA, Florida) 47th President of the United States & 1st wannabe dictator.

From the Meidas Touch

I have several reactions to this:

On the Fox News poll: CBS News anchor Walter Cronkite delivered his own editorial arguing that there was not a military solution to ending the Vietnam War… in 1968. President Lyndon Johnson was like in the mid 30s in popularity at that point, largely because of the Vietnam War, as well as rising crime rates, American culture changing too fast for the so-called middle Americans, especially older Americans, etc. And President Johnson’s reported response to the Cronkite editorial was: “When you’ve lost Walter Cronkite, you’ve lost Middle America.”

I’m not saying Fox News speaks for “Middle America”. But when you are Donald Trump, the DeFacto leader of the MAGA movement and you can’t even crack 50% in a Fox News poll, you are not even polling 40% on the economy, under 50% even on immigration… you know you are unpopular. That there’s something rotten in The White House and it’s not just Donald J. Trump (reported B.O. issues) but what they’re doing now is not even working politically for them and is hurting their party in Congress as well.

The Fox News poll also suggest that the Left is simply wrong about FNC, at least to this extent: President Trump has an 86% (according to Fox News) approval rating with the Republican Party, but his overall approval is 44%, according to Fox News. Which tells us the entire Fox News audience is not just small town, blue-collar, rednecks, etc. That Democrats watch FNC, Independents, as well as mainstream Republicans, not just the populist far-right in the country.

As far as Jesse Watters: I’m about 10 years older than Ben Meiselas and as a Gen-Xer, I remember all those Star Trek reruns from the 1980s and the films as well from that decade. Jesse Watters who is also a Gen-Xer, would get my reference, if he saw this… I think he looks like Commander Spock (played by Leonard Nimoy) from the Starship Enterprise, with the smooth black hair, thick sideburns. I would bet anything that Watters is not nearly as intelligent and even as funny as Dr. Spock. But that’s who Watters reminds me of.

If you are an Alfred Hitchcock fan, like myself, you’ve seen North By Northwest. Watters also looks like Leonard (played by Martin Landau) from that film.

Source:The New Democrat

You can follow me on Threads and Twitter.

Posted in Meidas Touch, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

David Pakman: Karoline Leavitt Drops DISGUSTING BOMB On Live TV

“Karoline Leavitt, Donald Trump’s White House Press Secretary, tells numerous obvious lies once again on live television”

Source:David Pakman Show with a look at White House Minister of Government Partisan Propaganda, Karoline Leavitt.

From the David Pakman Show

I’m willing to bet (perhaps not my life savings… certainly not my life) that David Pakman is at least smart enough to know this (but you wouldn’t know that based on how he talks about Karoline Leavitt) that she’s not up there to share facts and information with the public, especially the mainstream media.

Karoline Leavitt is only there to talk about how “totally awesome” or “absolutely fabulous” Donald Trump is and the rest of the Trump Administration is. And how everyone who opposes them, including their own people, or just tries to hold them accountable, (like the mainstream media) sucks… according to her and President Trump. So take everything that this White House says about anything, with a year’s supply of salt. And you better buy that salt while stores are still able to sell it and people can afford it.

So to spend 6 minutes of your own time on a YouTube video, talking about how much Karoline Leavitt ducks and weaves, and dodges, serious questions about this administration and just gives a lot of partisan spin about how “absolutely fabulous” things are now (which is so far from the truth, you would need a telescope to find it) and how much things sucked just 6 months ago, (which again has no basis in fact) I think is a waste of time on Mr. Pakman’s part.

I’m only explaining all of this because I want everyone to know who is just starting to get familiar with the Karoline Levitt’s of the world and the rest of the MAGA mouthpieces… they’re not in the news or even information business. They’re in the government partisan propaganda business.

So when this White House says things that are completely false or just flat-out lies, don’t act like you just saw the man on the Moon, having a drink with Pete Hegseth. Because there’s nothing surprising or even newsworthy about that. Karoline Leavitt is simply doing the job that President Trump hired her to do: Minister of Government Partisan Propaganda.

Source:The New Democrat

You can follow me on Threads and Twitter.

Posted in David Pakman, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Matt Lewis: If President AOC Governed Like Donald Trump — But in Reverse

“As Republicans roll the dice on rule of law, they forget history’s inconvenient truth: today’s power grab could be tomorrow’s undoing.

The other day, a Texas congressman named Brian Babin suggested that America should take a page from El Salvador dictator Nayib Bukele and “fire” judges.

I responded by asking whether Babin would support future president Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez firing judges who have the temerity to stand in her way.

My tweet was an intellectual exercise in futility. Babin didn’t respond, and why would he? Republicans have long since given up on empathy — that quaint, outdated concept of putting yourself in the other guy’s shoes:

Matt Lewis: Would you agree if/when President AOC fires judges who stand in her way?

U.S. Representative Brian Babin: Bukele fired activist judges and took his country back.

We should take notes, clean house, and fix America now.

From Matt Lewis

Still, once upon a time — and by “once,” I mean approximately five minutes ago — it was considered a cornerstone of democratic sanity to understand that the emergency powers, legal gymnastics, and constitutional vandalism you cheer today might be weaponized against you tomorrow.

To help Republicans imagine this possible scenario, I thought it might be instructive to imagine what President AOC might do if she inherited the Trumpian toolbox. You know, just to see how it fits.

Imagine it’s the year 2030. The headlines write themselves:

President AOC pressures major media and tech platforms to boot conservative voices, accusing them of spreading “toxic capitalism” and “environmental treason.” The White House press secretary assures reporters this is “not censorship, just carbon neutrality.”

Hunters (read “militia members” and “climate deniers”) from red states mysteriously vanish, blamed for “driving up emissions with their Dodge Rams, bloodlust, and fentanyl-fueled nihilism.” They are sent to Universal Basic Wellness Retreats, which become colloquially known as “Green GITMOs.”

AOC opens a boutique hotel in Brooklyn, where foreign ambassadors pony up large sums of money to her (note: Cuban and Venezuelan diplomats stay at government expense).

AOC targets white evangelical churches who are “preaching an oppressive ideology that we don’t like,” by threatening to revoke their tax-exempt status unless they fly rainbow flags and offer drag story hour for Sunday School.

The DOJ opens a criminal investigation into Fox News, citing “emotional harm caused by capitalist disinformation.” Hannity flees to Hungary.

An MSNBC host is named Secretary of Defense, with a mandate to reorient military strategy toward the existential threat of air conditioning.

The IRS dispatches armed agents to audit rural gun shops under suspicion of “hoarding generational trauma.”

Billionaires are ordered to wear bodycams, which livestream to a public accountability TikTok. When Republicans complain, liberals accuse them of being “pro-anonymity,” which is now a hate crime.

AOC ignores a Supreme Court ruling on Second Amendment rights, calling it illegitimate due to the Court’s “GOP-packed bench of oil lobbyists in robes.” Legal scholars clutch their pearls. AOC tweets a meme.

Every church is required to install a wind turbine or face daily fines. As she tweets, “Jesus may have flipped tables, but now he’s expected to charge Teslas.”

These are just a few possible chapters in our speculative dystopia — feel free to add your own in the comments, ideally while your constitutional protections still permit satire.

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t expect Republicans to heed our warnings. They’re not afraid of future tyrants. They’re too busy auditioning for one.

But let’s be clear: this isn’t solely a thought experiment. It’s a warning. Every norm shattered today is a roadmap for tomorrow’s leaders — whether they are on the right or the left.

If Republicans want to avoid this dark future, they might consider behaving as if the rules still apply — because one day, they might.

These are just a few possible chapters in our speculative dystopia — feel free to add your own in the comments, ideally while your constitutional protections still permit satire.

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t expect Republicans to heed our warnings. They’re not afraid of future tyrants. They’re too busy auditioning for one.

But let’s be clear: this isn’t solely a thought experiment. It’s a warning. Every norm shattered today is a roadmap for tomorrow’s leaders — whether they are on the right or the left.

If Republicans want to avoid this dark future, they might consider behaving as if the rules still apply — because one day, they might.”

Source:U.S. Representative Alexandria O. Cortez (Democratic Socialist, Bronx, New York)

From Matt Lewis

I think Matt Lewis’s main point here gets to the lack of forward thinking on the MAGA wing of the Republican Party right now. That everything is about now and what they can do now. And maybe they really do expect that Donald J. Trump will become America’s 1st dictator and they’ll just get away with it. And Democrats will never have the opportunity to do crazy, dictatorial things, but coming from the far-left in the future, because there will be no future. We’ll just become Donald J. Trump’s Dystopian States of America… his latest and last political reality TV show.

But then my first point here is about the political boomerang: everything that’s done in Washington at the Federal level, sets precedent for it being doing again in the future, but coming from different people, from the other party, especially when you are talking about partisan actions:

President Bush and the Republican Congress of 2003-04, passed their own health care bill dealing with Medicare, through reconciliation, with no House Democratic votes, in late 2003. Democrats did the same thing to pass the Affordable Care Act in 2010, with no Republican votes in Congress… House or Senate.

Senate Democrats eliminated the filibuster to pass President Obama’s executive and judicial nominees back in 2013. 3 and 1/2 years later, Senate Republicans eliminated the filibuster so they could get President Trump’s Supreme Court nominees through with just a simple majority.

And I could go and on and on… but hopefully anyone who sees this, has better things to do than to talk about partisan precedents in Congress and how they can come back to bite the other party.

I hate everything that Donald Trump and MAGA stands for. But the fact is his term will be up in early 2029 and he’ll be forced to leave The White House, whether he wants to or not. And that’s what MAGA with their myopic political vision doesn’t see. America will still be a liberal democratic republic, in early 2029 and we may have a Democratic administration then, with a Democratic Congress.

So for the pure fun of it, let’s assume current U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (some people know her simply as AOC) (Bronx, New York) becomes President of the United States and takes office in January, 2029:

Just from my perspective, this is the only way I see Representative O. Cortez winning The White House 3 years from now… assuming she never moderates and never gets elected to the U.S. Senate, first:

Similar to 2015-16, there are like 20 different Democrats for President. Most of them are center-left Progressive types, but similar with Donald Trump who got a little competition from what was called the Tea Party back then… there are like maybe 2-3 other Socialists who also decide to run for President as a Democrat as well.

So no one running for President, or the mainstream media is even taking AOC For President seriously. And she knocks the other Socialists out, because she’s the only 1 who can raise any money at all and who has a name.

And the supposed frontrunner Democrat, whether that’s Gavin Newsome, or Kamala Harris, maybe someone else, is not taking AOC For President seriously either and if anything they’re ignoring her in the early, summer, perhaps even fall debates in 2027.

See what I’m saying? The only reason why Donald J. Trump won The White House in 2016, is because he ran for President in a very crowded Republican field., where almost no one could get 35-40% of the vote in any of the Republican primaries. But in the Republican primaries, winner takes all in most of their primaries. It’s winner-takes-all in most of those primaries, which means you can win a lot of primaries there with 3-10 voters and get all of those delegates.

So to move up my hypothetical a little bit:

The country is now in recession, thanks to the Trump Administration’s trade war and national debt bomb they’re setting off because of all the deficit spending and Vice President J.D. Vance couldn’t run away from President Trump, even in a Ferrari sports car, or even fly away from him, and he gets tied to the President as tightly as a death row inmate who is about to be executed and the Democratic Party unites being Ocasio-Cortez and even Independents, perhaps even a few white-collar Republicans, because similar to back to 2016, America was ready for any change from the current situation of the country.

So now for the really fun part

Just for the record: I don’t see Alexandria O. Cortez as a Communist… even as a Chavez/Maduro style Neo-Communist. That might be a newsflash for people who read The New Democrat and see how we talk about other Socialists.

To me, as a President, I think AOC would be more like a George McGovern, or Bernie Sanders as POTUS: someone who is a small d democrat in political practice in how they govern. But way too far to the left of even her own party, to be an effective leader in moving Congress and passing anything consequential as a result. And would probably be a one-termer, unless she moderated as was able to work with the next Republican Congress and even be able to run against them for reelection as well.

But let’s say I’m wrong (for the first time in my entire life, LOL) and Matt Lewis is correct here:

So in President Ocasio Cortez’s first month as President, she signs all sorts of executive orders dealing from everything to banning junk food and soft drinks, from the Federal level, to outlawing eating meat from the Federal level, to outlawing sports bars. And that’s just from the left-wing feminist dream list of things they would want her to do.

So now President Ocasio Cortez loses all of these executive orders in court and she orders her Attorney General Larry Tribe, to arrest all these Federal judges and even the 9 U.S. Justices who ruled against her 100% of the time. And the Attorney General goes along with all of that.

When Congress votes down President Ocasio Cortez’s budget that would double even middle class tax rates and people on the wealthy would pay between 90-100% and guts the national security, and law enforcement, and intelligence budgets by 70% and maybe only 30 House Democrats vote for it and 1-2 in the Senate, she passes her own Socialist budget through executive order. But this time it gets through, because remember she just fired all the Federal judges who voted against her cultural war executive orders and we now have a new Supreme Court, because she just fired the previous justices through EO and no one’s left to stop her.

As I said before, I don’t see AOC as a Communist. And maybe Matt Lewis and I just disagree on that. But as I also said before, there’s a political boomerang affect in Washington. What 1 party tries to do to the other, can come back and kick in the ass just 2-4 years later.

There might be some actual Communists out there in America right now thinking: “Look at what we could do, if only we win The White House and stack the administration behind us”.

If you really are a Republican and you actually care about not just your party, but America as well, you need to be saying no to Donald Trump’s effort to try to become an American dictator. If for no other reasons, the practical reason that you don’t want America to ever become a Communist State.

Source:The New Democrat

You can follow me on Threads and Twitter.

Posted in Matt Lewis, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

James Carville On Bill Maher & Larry David

“James Carville: Who’s Right, Larry David Or Bill Maher. Politics War Room (with James Carville & Al Hunt)More Politicon videos and podcasts available on our YouTube channel: / @politicon”

Source:Politicon with the mad political scientist, James Carville.

From Politicon

From The Forward:

“Add Larry David to the list of celebrities who were put off by comedian Bill Maher’s friendly sitdown with President Trump.

In a New York Times opinion piece, “My Dinner with Adolf,” the Jewish creator of “Curb Your Enthusiasm” imagines a get-to-know-you meeting “at the Old Chancellery with the world’s most reviled man, Adolf Hitler.”

The narrator ends up being charmed by the Nazi leader. “I thought that if only the world could see this side of him, people might have a completely different opinion,” he gushes.

The essay doesn’t mention Maher, but in a newsletter Times deputy opinion editor Patrick Healy acknowledges that David proposed the article in response to Maher’s description of his recent meeting with Trump. Describing their dinner on his Max show “Real Time,” Maher said he found the president to be “gracious and measured” and hardly the “crazy person” he often seems on TV.

According to Healy, David sent him an unsolicited email suggesting his essay. Healy wrote that the Times seeks to avoid Nazi references in the essays it publishes, but felt David’s piece “is not equating Trump with Hitler. It is about seeing someone for who they really are and not losing sight of that.”

David joined other critics of Maher’s conciliatory description of his Trump meeting. “Bill is just the latest in a whole series of people who get had by the personal charm, if you will, of some really bad people,” said Democratic strategist James Carville on his “Politics War Room” podcast.

In a segment on “Real Time,” Washington Post global security analyst Josh Rogin told Maher he was a “prop” in Trump’s “PR stunt.”

In the David piece, the narrator banters amiably with Hitler, who laughs at his jokes. “I realized I’d never seen him laugh before,” he writes. “Suddenly he seemed so human.”

Maher said something similar about Trump in his monologue: “Just for starters, he laughs! I’ve never seen him laugh in public. But he does, including at himself. And it’s not fake.”

In his editor’s note, Healy writes that “David, in a provocation of his own, is arguing that during a single dinner or a private meeting, anyone can be human, and it means nothing in the end about what they’re capable of.”

David, who skewered conservative policies on his long-running HBO show, has often used Nazi references in his satire. As a standup comedian, he would goad audiences by saying “The one thing about Hitler that I admire…” before suggesting that the dictator had no patience for stage magicians. He and Jerry Seinfeld created the “Soup Nazi” character on “Seinfeld,” and “Curb” featured a memorable clash between a Holocaust survivor and a contestant on the reality show “Survivor” who too considered himself a victim.

Such jokes have divided audiences, and even individual critics. In an essay criticizing David for a Holocaust joke he told while hosting “Satruday Night Live” in 2017, Jeremy Dauber praised the “Survivor” episode on “Curb.” “In that ‘Curb’ episode,” writes Dauber, a professor of Jewish literature at Columbia University, “David is searchingly moral, flaying a kind of ethical vacuity and historical relativism about the Holocaust.”

David’s piece is also reminiscent of a 2003 skit by the Jewish comedian Jon Stewart, who imagines Hitler being interviewed by the late Larry King, the ingratiating CNN talk show host.

In his Max monologue, Maher, who positions himself as a centrist truth-teller between political extremes, anticipates the blowback he was sure to receive as a result of his dinner with a deeply polarizing president. “You can hate me for it, but I’m not a liar. Trump was gracious and measured, and why he isn’t that in other settings, I don’t know,” he said.”

From The Forward

If you have been reading The New Democrat since February, you know that we’ve backed James Carville a lot. But his question: “Who’s Right, Larry David Or Bill Maher?”, is at best rhetorical, or worst, it’s nonsensical.

Asking “Who’s Right, Larry David Or Bill Maher?”, is like asking:

“Who makes better luxury cars: Cadillac or Lincoln?”

Or, “Who makes better cola: Pepsi or Coke?”

Or, “Who makes better trucks: Ford or Chevrolet?”

There isn’t 1 right answer to any of these questions because there aren’t any real undisputed facts involved. It depends on the customer and what they’re looking for and their own personal tastes.

And my other point here sort of goes to my first point: Bill Maher is not an historian, or journalist, public official. For anyone who was born yesterday: Bill Maher is a comedian, an entertainer, a businessman. If he thinks having dinner with President Trump Donald Trump is good for his business and career, that’s what he’s going to do. And it’s almost pointless to say he’s wrong in doing that.

Leftists, including leftist Democrats used to think of Bill Maher, even as recently as 10-15 years ago, as their latest hipster guru who would lead them to the promise land because he praised socialism and Socialists. But then they discovered that he also believes in personal freedom and free speech, so they sort of dumped him like someone walking around with a bomb that’s about to explode and called him a bigot and a lot of other unpleasant things.

Bill Maher and Larry David are both comedians. (Hopefully that’s not a newsflash for anyone who is sane and sober right now) They’re going to do what’s in the best interests of their careers. Nothing more.

Source:The New Democrat

You can follow me on Threads.

Posted in Politicon, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tim Miller & Sam Stein: Why the Hell Is Kristi Noem Carrying Around $3,000 in Cash?!

“Tim Miller and Sam Stein discuss the bizarre theft of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s purse containing $3,000 cash, a passport, and a DHS badge. How did this happen with Secret Service protection around? And what’s the real story behind carrying so much cash?

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s bag, including $3,000 in cash, is stolen from DC restaurant…

Source:The Bulwark with Tim Miller & Sam Stein, talking about that doggone (pun intended) DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.

From The Bulwark

From CNN:

“Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem fell victim to a thief while eating dinner at a downtown Washington, DC, restaurant Sunday night, the secretary confirmed Monday.

Noem, who was asked about the theft at the White House Easter Egg Roll, acknowledged the incident and said the matter has not been resolved.

The Secret Service, which provides security for Noem, reviewed security camera footage at the Capital Burger restaurant and saw an unknown white male wearing a medical mask steal her bag and leave the restaurant, a law enforcement source said.

The thief got away with Noem’s driver’s license, medication, apartment keys, passport, DHS access badge, makeup bag, blank checks, and about $3,000 in cash.

The Secret Service has launched an investigation to trace any use of Noem’s financial instruments, the person added.

“Her entire family was in town including her children and grandchildren – she was using the withdrawal to treat her family to dinner, activities, and Easter gifts,” a DHS spokesperson said…

Source:CNN with a look at U.S. Secretary of Reality TV… I mean Homeland Security, (natural mistake) Kristi Noem.

From CNN

I would say that: “The New Democrat has been all over Kristi Noem for 13 months now. Just not in the way you might think we have been. (Get your head out of the gutter. MAGA sleeps there.)”, but that’s simply not true… for multiple reasons. This is just our 3rd piece about her and my first doggone piece (pun intended) about her:

“My theory for why Kristi Noem decided to do this, is she’s a much smarter politician than she seems to want anyone whose not inside of her South Dakota circle to know. I think she believes that Donald Trump is a loser, whose going down, because he’s going to lose overwhelmingly with women. And even lose too many Republicans with all his legal baggage, including the fact he could be a two-time convicted felon before election day in November and that will make it too hard for him to beat President Biden in November. And she doesn’t want to be part of that electoral catastrophe. And she sure as hell doesn’t want to get blamed for it. But that’s my theory.”

From The New Democrat

“Does anyone who is currently sane, sober, and intelligent, (who isn’t 1 of Pete Hegseth’s drinking buddies) think this little c-film from Noem Productions, are going to to prevent Latin gangbangers and terrorists, as well as just innocent people from those countries, who are simply trying to escape the poverty and crime of those countries, from trying to come to America, legally, or illegally? Anyone want to make that bet?”

From The New Democrat

I don’t want to have too much fun about this story, because as someone who is an avid cyclist, I’ve had 3 of my bikes jacked from me just in the last 5 plus years. So I know something about this and what that experience is like to be robbed. But “too much” might be the key words here. When you are a player who should be in the rookie leagues and your official nickname is “not ready for prime time”, or “Dog Gone Kristi Noem”, a lot of bad, humorous, things are going to happen to you when you are in the majors, simply because you don’t belong there and are well-unqualified to be there.

This latest doggone (pun intended) story about Kristi Nome… gives someone a lot of freedom to speculate and make fun of. The obvious questions being:

Where the hell was the Secret Service? (To paraphrase The Bulwark)

How did this person who was wearing a freakin mask, (for crying out loud) get anywhere near the U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security? And goes to the first question about the SS.

Why is someone who is making $246,000 a year, who collects a lot more than that, when you are talking about all the travel, meals, security, etc, she gets at taxpayer expense… doing with $3,000 in cash on her? Someone making that kind of money, you would think would have credit cards to spare.

And of course the passport: does she ever go home? And I’m not talking about South Dakota, where she belongs and she can just be their problem. But she must have an apartment, or townhouse, in or around Washington.

So now the fun part. I’m not saying I know the answers to these questions, but this is me speculating, perhaps even in a humorous way:

So is the answer to the first question: “Where the hell was the Secret Service?”,

Kristi Noem is so unpopular even the Secret Service don’t like her?

Or, dogs are part of her security and they were just trying to protect the dogs from “that doggone (pun intended) woman”?

And the question about the person with the mask: maybe they thought he was just a MAGA person who simply wanted the Secretary’s autograph, who represented no threat to her? Maybe they thought he just wanted to congratulate her for doing such a doggone (pun intended) good job?

And then why did Kristi Noem’s have $3,000 on her at a local restaurant? Maybe she’s had enough of Washington and Donald J. Trump, and she was simply trying to make a break for it, after she had a good meal? That could perhaps answer the passport question as well. But again, I’m just speculating here.

Source:The New Democrat

You can follow me on Threads and Twitter.

Posted in The Bulwark, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

John Berman & Kate Bolduan: Pete Hegseth Blames ‘Disgruntled Former Employees’ & The Media Amid Another Signal Scandal

“Saying “anonymous smears from disgruntled former employees on old news doesn’t matter,” Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth addressed the new allegations that he shared Yemen strike plans in a second Signal group chat. CNN’s Natasha Bertrand reports.”

Source:CNN with a look at U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Perhaps the Secretary is wondering why they don’;t serve beer at The White House Easter Roll. But that’s a guess.

From CNN

From U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth:

“What a big surprise that a few leakers get fired and suddenly a bunch of hit pieces come out from the same media that peddled the Russia hoax, won’t give back their Pulitzers, they got Pulitzers for a bunch of lies … This is what the media does. They take anonymous sources from disgruntled former employees and then they try to slash and burn people and ruin their reputations.”

From C-SPAN

Just to start off with, I have an anecdote that I would like to share first.

It was literally last Friday night, at around 10PM, I’m just getting done that day at work (because this is how much The New Democrat loves their readers) and I was thinking as I was leaving the office, that Secretary Hegseth might still be at his office at The Pentagon right now. Not there working hard for America’s national security. (Don’t be silly) But there having a few, perhaps a few more, not realizing that he could’ve gone home, or to his favorite bar in Washington, or some place… 4-5 hours ago. But he’s too drunk to realize that.

This might sound like I’m just making fun on an alcoholic, (or as Bart Simpson says: Al Coholic) but this story that no one at The White House, or at The Pentagon, including in the Secretary’s executive office, is denying, was literally reported about 48 hours later from whatever was going on with the Secretary from last Friday night. They’re just playing the old Watergate game from the 1970s of the non-denial, denial:

“Yes, it’s true. But this story is the media’s fault because they reported exactly what happened and it makes us look bad.” Or in Pete Hegseth’s case: it makes him look bad.

From The New Democrat about the Hegseth nomination back in January:

“If you privately polled the Senate Republican Conference, or slipped some truth serum in their favorite coffee or favorite alcohol beverage, (according to Senator Mullin) or they were under oath, they would privately tell you that Pete Hegseth has no business serving as a Defense Department intern, let alone as Secretary of Defense. That he’s better qualified attending Alcoholic Anonymous meetings, and attending anger management meetings, then being responsible for America’s national security. But President Trump wants Hegseth, so that’s who he gets, according to a sold majority of the Senate Republican Conference. That’s my guess…

From The New Democrat

And to respond to a point that Jane Harman made on CNN: Donald Trump only fires his loyal staffers and cabinet members, when they become a problem for him personally. The President firing people has nothing to  do with what’s in the best interest of the country, because he doesn’t care about that. (To be real)

And as former Representative Harman said, Pete Hegseth is now embarrassing The White House and the President because he was Donald Trump’s original choice for Secretary of Defense. But it’s now quite obvious that the Secretary of Defense can’t even be trusted with classified information. And it’s becoming harder for Congressional Republicans (House & Senate) to defend him against anything that comes up against him, especially if they’re in for tough reelection battles in 2026.

Source:The New Democrat

You can follow me on Threads.

Posted in CNN, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Tonight Show With Johnny Carson: Burt Reynolds (June, 1986)

“Burt Reynolds Saws Johnny in Half | Carson Tonight Show. Original Airdate: June 06, 1986”

Source:Johnny Carson enjoying Burt Reynolds magical appearance on his show. (Pun intended)

From Johnny Carson

So Burt comes out and they’re just telling each other “how good is it to see each other”, etc and Johnny tells Burt:

“We’ve known each other what 20 years? You come out here and you have nothing to plug: no movie, no album, TV show, etc”,

and Burt says: “That right there tells you my career is insufficient”.

And Johnny says: “Well put”.

And Burt says: “That’s all right. I’m here because I want to be here”.

So this small talk right here (or is that small chat?) reminds me of an interview that Johnny Carson did of comedian Steve Martin back in 1978:

“Steve Martin tells Johnny Carson he has to leave on “The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson” in 1978. One of the funniest moments on the Johnny Carson show! More Steve Martin on Johnny Carson’s show”.

When the fact is, Steve Martin has nowhere else to be that night:

Doesn’t have a hooker waiting to see him

Doesn’t have to meet his drug dealer

Doesn’t have to meet with lawyer to talk about his latest divorce or paying off his latest mistress, etc. He has nowhere else to be. Steve Martin could’ve jumped in the Pacific Ocean that night and tried to swim to Hawaii from California and no one in the world would have missed him… according to Steve Martin. (And I’m having a little fun with this) So why not just hang out with Johnny Carson and just kill time?

And you can see the whole skit with Martin and Carson on The New Democrat

And then Burt was telling Johnny about turning 50 years old and he said: “And when I turned… 50” and he said it really softly

And Johnny replies: “I didn’t hear that.

With Burt replying: “I know. Because when you get as old as you, you can’t here”.

As I said on Tuesday right here:

“I swear if Burt Reynolds didn’t act full-time, he would’ve been a full-time standup comedian and probably 1 of the best ever, who would do comedy films, or action/comedy films, perhaps just as research for his own standup material, or just for the hell of it. He was so quick that when you put him on Johnny Carson (who was a full-time comedian) and Burt becomes the comedian and can make Johnny Carson look as straight and stiff Ted Koppel anchoring ABC News Nightline.”.

From The New Democrat

And then Burt was telling Johnny about turning 50 years old and he said: “And when I turned… 50” and he said it really softly

And Johnny replies: “I didn’t hear that.

With Burt replying: “I know. Because when you get as old as you, you can’t here”.

As I said on Tuesday right here:

Burt comes on Carson with no script and no material to work with, comedically and he just goes off of what Carson is asking him and talking to him about and Burt Reynolds who was never a full-time standup comedian and perhaps never did standup at all, becomes the comedian on the show and Johnny becomes the straight journalist. That’s how quick and funny Burt Reynolds was.

Source:The New Democrat

You can follow me on Threads and Twitter.

Posted in Carson Classic, The New Democrat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment